Have Four Individuals Been Charged in a Rs 50 Lakh Land Fraud Case by J&K Crime Branch?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- J&K Crime Branch actively pursues land fraud cases.
- A total of four individuals have been charged.
- The case involves a substantial amount of Rs 50 lakh.
- Allegations include cheating and criminal conspiracy.
- Importance of verifying property documents and claims.
Srinagar, Dec 20 (NationPress) – The Crime Branch of J&K Police announced on Saturday the filing of a charge sheet against four suspects involved in a rs 50 lakh land fraud case, encompassing allegations of cheating and criminal conspiracy.
According to a statement from the Crime Branch, the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) has submitted this charge sheet in FIR No. 02/2025 under Sections 420 and 471 in conjunction with Section 120-B of the RPC to the Hon’ble Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar. This action pertains to the suspects’ alleged participation in a significant land fraud scheme.
The charge sheet identifies the accused as Mohd Afzal Sheikh, son of the late Ghulam Qadir Sheikh, residing in Gopalpora, Chadoora, Budgam; Mohd Sikander Dar, son of Ghulam Mohd Dar, from Chainabal Mirgund, Pattan, Baramulla; and Ali Mohd Dar, son of Mohd Ibrahim Dar, also from Chainabal Mirgund, Pattan, Baramulla.
The investigation was initiated following a written complaint alleging that in September 2022, the complainant was misled by the accused land brokers and the landowner into purchasing four kanals of land situated at Revenue Estate Ranbirgarh–Pratapgarh, Srinagar. The complainant was shown various documents including revenue records, Naqsh-e-Amini, and geo-tagged photographs to validate the ownership and location of the land. Based on these assurances, the complainant transferred Rs 50 lakh, post which the sale deed was executed and possession was granted.
However, it was later revealed that the land depicted at the site did not match the land specified in the sale deed.
The investigation disclosed that the complainant was shown accessible land under Survey No. 207, while the actual land sold was Survey No. 94, which is categorized as wetland with no access. Furthermore, the probe confirmed that the accused colluded with each other to forge and misuse documents to defraud the complainant.
The investigation has firmly established a meticulously orchestrated criminal conspiracy. Consequently, the charge sheet has been submitted for judicial review.