Why is Ashok Gehlot questioning the US's role in the India-Pakistan ceasefire?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a critical examination of US involvement in India-Pakistan relations, Ashok Gehlot highlights India's historical resistance to foreign intervention. Discover the implications of foreign influence on national sovereignty and the timeless stance of Indian leadership against external pressures.
Key Takeaways
- Gehlot questions US intervention in bilateral matters.
- India's historical resistance to foreign pressure is a point of pride.
- Foreign mediation could undermine India's sovereignty.
- Criticism of the government's handling of ceasefire highlights national concerns.
- Gehlot calls for transparency from the central government.
Jaipur, May 12 (NationPress) In light of the US's role in mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, Ashok Gehlot, a senior Congress leader and former Chief Minister of Rajasthan, has expressed his concerns. He criticized the central government for permitting third-party intervention in a matter that should be strictly bilateral.
Gehlot remarked, "India has a proud history of standing firm against international pressure. It's troubling for us as citizens to see the US President announce a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. What compelled our government to accept such interference?" He shared this sentiment in a post on X.
To illustrate India's historical approach to foreign interference, Gehlot referenced two significant events. He recalled the 1961 Liberation of Goa, stating, “In Class 6, Goa was still under Portuguese rule. Despite the international pressures, including threats from NATO member Portugal, Prime Minister Nehru launched Operation Vijay. The US Ambassador even advised Nehru against action, yet his determination, alongside the valor of the Indian Army, resulted in Goa's integration into India.”
Gehlot also mentioned the 1974 merger of Sikkim, noting, “By my university days, Sikkim was a monarchy that had US backing, largely due to its American-origin queen. Despite facing threats from the US, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi decisively integrated Sikkim into India.”
He underscored that India's policy, rooted in Indira Gandhi's time, has been to reject any external mediation in India-Pakistan relations. “The nation is unsettled by America’s involvement in the recent military operation. Why was this permitted? What has changed? The central government must provide answers,” he stated.
The Congress party has been vocal in its criticism of the government's management of the ceasefire, arguing that letting a foreign nation announce such a pivotal event undermines India’s sovereignty and diplomatic integrity.
Point of View
It is crucial to understand the delicate balance of international relations. While nations like the US may seek to mediate, India's historical stance emphasizes sovereign decisions. The focus should remain on maintaining India's integrity while navigating complex geopolitical landscapes.
NationPress
26/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ashok Gehlot's stance on US involvement?
Gehlot criticizes the US's role in mediating a ceasefire, viewing it as a breach of India's sovereignty.
What historical examples does Gehlot cite?
He references the Liberation of Goa in 1961 and the merger of Sikkim in 1974 to illustrate India's resistance to foreign pressure.
Why is this issue significant?
It raises concerns about India’s autonomy in its diplomatic affairs and the implications of foreign intervention.
