Is India Justified in Defending Its National Interests?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a critical analysis, Professor Prabhash Ranjan articulates India's steadfast position against U.S. pressure on tariffs and trade. As tensions rise, he highlights the importance of sovereignty and the implications for the Global South.
Key Takeaways
- India prioritizes its national sovereignty in oil and arms purchases.
- US tariffs are viewed as illegal under international law.
- India’s response reflects a necessary assertiveness in global affairs.
- Protecting farmers’ livelihoods is crucial in trade negotiations.
- India is positioning itself as a leader of the Global South.
New Delhi, Aug 7 (NationPress) India is making a commendable choice by standing firm on its national interests despite increasing pressure from the United States, noted Prabhash Ranjan, Professor at OP Jindal Global University, in an exclusive interview. As tensions mount between India and Washington over tariffs and trade discussions, Ranjan emphasized that India's decisions regarding oil and arms purchases reflect its sovereignty.
In response to tariffs imposed by the US, including a 25% duty followed by another 25%, Ranjan stated, “No nation, including the US, should have the authority to intervene in India’s decisions.” He further pointed out that additional US tariffs under such pretexts would constitute a violation of international law, specifically WTO regulations. “These tariffs are not just unjust; they are fundamentally illegal,” he asserted.
He commended India’s assertive stance against the US, calling it necessary for the nation's dignity. “India has prioritized its national interests. This decisive position was long overdue,” Ranjan remarked.
Professor Ranjan sees this as a pivotal opportunity for India to step up as a leader for the Global South. “The Global South is observing closely. In an era where the US, particularly under Donald Trump, is acting unilaterally, India must uphold its moral and strategic obligations,” he explained.
Even amidst trade discussions with the US, India remains resolute. “Entering negotiations does not mean India will concede to unreasonable demands. India is rightly establishing and adhering to its red lines,” he asserted.
On agriculture, Ranjan voiced strong support for the Indian government's position against US pressures to liberalize the sector. “The US is urging India to open its agricultural markets to American imports, which jeopardizes our farmers' livelihoods. India cannot permit heavily subsidized US products to inundate its markets,” he elaborated.
He acknowledged Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s firm stance on this matter, stating, “PM Modi has asserted he will not compromise the welfare of Indian farmers, even at a personal political cost. This is a bold and essential approach.”
According to Ranjan, India's refusal to comply with US agricultural demands extends beyond trade; it is about safeguarding the rural economy. “Our agriculture sector is highly sensitive, and its protection is vital for national survival. The government's actions are entirely justified,” he concluded.
Point of View
It's crucial to recognize that India’s approach to defending its national interests reflects a strategic shift in global politics. The government's stance is not merely about trade negotiations; it’s fundamentally about sovereignty, economic stability, and the welfare of millions of farmers. In this context, India’s position is not only justified but necessary for its long-term growth and regional leadership.
NationPress
05/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is India’s current stance on U.S. tariffs?
India firmly opposes the U.S. tariffs, viewing them as unjust and a violation of international law.
How does this situation affect India’s agricultural sector?
The U.S. push for agricultural market access poses a threat to Indian farmers, and the government is committed to protecting their livelihoods.
What role does India aspire to play in the Global South?
India aims to emerge as a leader for the Global South, advocating for the interests of developing nations against unilateral actions by larger powers.
