Jagan Mohan Reddy regrets backing 2023 Election Commissioner appointment law

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Jagan Mohan Reddy regrets backing 2023 Election Commissioner appointment law

Synopsis

Jagan Mohan Reddy has done something rare in Indian politics — admitted his party made a legislative mistake. YSRCP's backing of the 2023 Election Commissioner appointment law, which removed the Chief Justice of India from the selection panel, is now something Reddy says he regrets. The admission comes as YSRCP alleges the TDP is using that very framework to tilt election administration ahead of local body polls.

Key Takeaways

Jagan Mohan Reddy on 18 October publicly regretted YSRCP's support for the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 .
He argued the current panel — Prime Minister plus a PM-nominated minister (two votes) versus Leader of Opposition (one vote) — structurally favours the ruling party.
Reddy demanded restoration of the earlier three-member panel: Prime Minister , Leader of Opposition , and Chief Justice of India .
He also called for a similar neutral appointment process for the State Election Commissioner , alleging SEC Anil Chandra Punetha was acting on CM Chandrababu Naidu's directions.
The remarks followed a meeting with SEC Punetha over alleged attempts to block YSRCP nominations ahead of upcoming local body polls .

Former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister and YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) President Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy on Sunday, 18 October publicly admitted regret over his party's support for the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, arguing that no ruling party — including the current Telugu Desam Party (TDP)-led coalition in Andhra Pradesh — should control the selection of election commissioners.

What Jagan Said and Why

Speaking at a press conference in Tadepalli, Reddy acknowledged that YSRCP had backed the legislation when in power at the Centre, but said the party now views that decision as a mistake. 'Earlier at the Centre, YSRCP supported the system wherein the ruling party can nominate the Election Commissioner but today we are regretting the mistake we made by supporting it,' he said.

He framed the critique in structural terms: 'An examiner cannot be appointed by the student. No matter how sincere the examiner is, he has to face criticism if appointment is not done by a neutral body.'

The Flaw He Identified in the Current Law

Reddy pointed to a specific imbalance embedded in the 2023 Act: under the current selection panel, the Prime Minister and a minister nominated by the Prime Minister hold two votes, while the Leader of the Opposition holds one vote. 'Since two votes go in favour of one person, he will be a nominee of the government. This is a flaw in the system. We realised this after we made the mistake,' the YSRCP chief said.

He demanded a return to the earlier appointment framework — a three-member panel comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India — arguing that the inclusion of the Chief Justice would ensure genuine neutrality.

Demand Extended to State Election Commissioner

Reddy also demanded parallel reforms at the state level. He said Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu and the TDP should not retain the power to appoint the State Election Commissioner (SEC). He alleged that SEC Anil Chandra Punetha — appointed by Naidu — was acting on the Chief Minister's directions.

The remarks came shortly after Reddy met SEC Punetha to formally complain about what he described as attempts by the ruling TDP-led coalition to prevent YSRCP candidates from filing nomination papers for the upcoming local body polls.

Context: A Law YSRCP Once Championed

The 2023 Act replaced a decades-old convention under which the CEC appointment panel included the Chief Justice of India. The Supreme Court had, in a landmark 2023 ruling, directed Parliament to legislate on the matter; the resulting law was criticised by the Opposition at the time for removing judicial oversight. YSRCP's support for the legislation was notable given its position as a key ally in certain parliamentary votes. Reddy's admission of regret is significant because it marks one of the few instances of a former ruling-party partner publicly walking back support for the law.

Notably, this reversal comes as YSRCP faces what it describes as administrative obstruction ahead of local elections — lending a pointed political backdrop to what Reddy framed as a principled demand for institutional reform.

Point of View

Given the timing — election season, local body polls, an SEC complaint filed the same day — is another question altogether.
NationPress
18 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Jagan Mohan Reddy say about the 2023 Election Commissioner law?
Jagan Mohan Reddy said YSRCP regrets supporting the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which allows the ruling government to effectively control the CEC appointment through a weighted voting panel. He called the decision a mistake and demanded the law be reformed to restore the earlier neutral selection process.
What is the flaw in the 2023 Election Commissioner appointment law?
Under the 2023 Act, the selection panel comprises the Prime Minister and a minister nominated by the PM — giving the ruling side two votes — against one vote for the Leader of the Opposition. Reddy argues this structural imbalance means the appointee is effectively the government's nominee, compromising the independence of the Election Commission.
What appointment system is Jagan demanding instead?
Reddy has demanded restoration of the earlier three-member panel comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India. He argued that the Chief Justice's presence makes the body genuinely neutral. He is seeking a similar framework for the appointment of State Election Commissioners.
Why did Jagan meet the Andhra Pradesh State Election Commissioner?
Jagan Mohan Reddy met State Election Commissioner Anil Chandra Punetha on 18 October to formally complain that the ruling TDP-led coalition government was allegedly attempting to prevent YSRCP candidates from filing nominations for upcoming local body polls. He also alleged that the SEC was acting on Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu's directions.
When did YSRCP support the 2023 Election Commissioner law, and why does it matter?
YSRCP supported the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act when it was passed in 2023, lending the legislation a cross-party appearance. The law replaced a Supreme Court-directed framework that had included the Chief Justice of India on the selection panel. Reddy's reversal matters because it reopens the debate on judicial oversight of India's election administration.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 hours ago
  2. 4 days ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 3 weeks ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google