Ronisha Satti blames police inaction for suicide attempt over fake page harassment

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ronisha Satti blames police inaction for suicide attempt over fake page harassment

Synopsis

Hospitalised after an alleged suicide attempt, Jammu influencer Ronisha Satti says she spent a month filing complaints with multiple police departments — including the Cybercrime Department — only to be ignored while her former fiancé allegedly used a fake social media page to upload her personal photos and destroy her reputation. Her account raises sharp questions about the state of cybercrime enforcement in Jammu.

Key Takeaways

Ronisha Satti , a social media influencer from Jammu , is hospitalised after an alleged suicide attempt on or before 29 May .
She alleges her former fiancé Prashant Sharma ran a fake social media page to upload her personal photos and videos without consent.
Satti claims she filed complaints with multiple police departments, including the Cybercrime Department , over a period of roughly one month with no action taken.
Her 12-year-old maternal cousin was also reportedly targeted with abuse on social media, according to Satti.
Satti said the court will decide whether the allegations against her are valid, and stressed she had cooperated fully with police.

Jammu-based social media influencer Ronisha Satti, currently hospitalised after allegedly attempting suicide, has publicly accused the police of failing to act on her complaints about harassment by her former fiancé Prashant Sharma, who she claims ran a fake social media page to defame her. Speaking from her hospital bed on 29 May, Satti said her condition had stabilised but that she remained under medical observation.

What Satti Alleged

Satti alleged that Sharma used a fake social media profile to upload her personal photos and videos without consent, systematically damaging her reputation over a period of roughly one month. 'My entire reputation has been undermined using a fake page,' she said. 'I asked the police for help. I sought help from the Cybercrime Department; had they wanted, they could have tracked the IP address.'

She also said the harassment had extended to her family. 'My family has been targeted. My 12-year-old maternal cousin is also being subjected to abuse on social media,' she said, adding that the episode had been witnessed by 'the entire Jammu.'

The Relationship and Its Breakdown

According to Satti, she and Sharma were in a relationship and had been planning to marry when disputes arose. She described the fallout as a private matter that should have been resolved within the family. 'We were meant to get married, but had our share of fights, just like many other couples. But it did not mean that it would be taken to court or the police station,' she said.

She acknowledged that an FIR had been filed against her at some point but said she had cooperated fully with investigators and provided evidence. 'I did not take this extreme step when an FIR was filed against me. Even then, I was ready to face the situation,' she said.

Cybercrime Complaint and Alleged Police Inaction

Satti said she had visited multiple police departments over the course of a month seeking intervention, including the Cybercrime Department, but received no relief. She alleged that police failed to trace the IP address linked to the fake account despite having the technical capability to do so.

'How were my personal photos and videos with Prashant uploaded on social media? Why did the police not take any action at that time?' she asked. She cautioned that the absence of accountability created a dangerous precedent. 'This way, anybody would attempt suicide,' she said. 'Where would the girls go if the police do not take any action?'

What Satti Said About Due Process

The influencer stressed that she was being treated as a culprit without any trial or judicial finding. 'Just because he is not able to prove it, it does not mean that I can be abused using a fake social media page,' she said. She added that even when disputes reach court, they should be contested through legal process — not through anonymous online attacks.

Satti said the court would ultimately determine the truth of the allegations. As of 29 May, no official police response to her accusations had been reported. The case has drawn attention to gaps in cybercrime enforcement and online harassment protections for women in Jammu.

Point of View

If verified, exposes a recurring failure in India's cybercrime enforcement architecture: victims report fake profiles and non-consensual image sharing, and departments acknowledge the complaint without acting on it. The Cybercrime Department's ability to trace IP addresses is well established — the question is institutional will, not technical capacity. This case also surfaces a gendered dimension: Satti's pointed question — 'Where would the girls go if the police do not take any action?' — is not rhetorical. It reflects a documented pattern where women disproportionately bear the cost of delayed cyber-harassment response. The mainstream coverage will focus on the influencer angle; the harder story is the one-month compliance gap before a crisis point was reached.
NationPress
10 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Ronisha Satti and what happened to her?
Ronisha Satti is a social media influencer from Jammu who was hospitalised after allegedly attempting suicide. She has publicly stated that the attempt followed a month of harassment through a fake social media page she attributes to her former fiancé, Prashant Sharma, and a lack of police response to her complaints.
What harassment did Ronisha Satti allege against Prashant Sharma?
Satti alleged that Sharma used a fake social media profile to upload her personal photos and videos without her consent, damaging her reputation. She also said her family members, including a 12-year-old cousin, were targeted with online abuse through the same or related accounts.
Why does Satti blame the police?
Satti says she visited multiple police departments, including the Cybercrime Department, over roughly one month seeking action against the fake page, but received none. She alleged that police could have traced the IP address behind the account but chose not to act.
What is the current legal status of the case?
Satti acknowledged that an FIR had been filed against her at some stage, but said she had cooperated fully with investigators. She stated that the court would determine the truth of all allegations. As of 29 May, no official police response to her accusations had been reported.
What broader issue does this case highlight?
The case draws attention to gaps in cybercrime enforcement and the protection of women from non-consensual image sharing and online defamation in India. Satti's account suggests that even when victims proactively approach the Cybercrime Department, delays in response can have severe consequences.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google