Is Justice Varma Challenging the SC's Probe Report on Cash Discovery?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Justice Yashwant Varma has challenged the Supreme Court's indictment following a significant cash discovery scandal linked to his residence. This legal battle raises questions about judicial integrity and due process as the nation watches closely. Will he succeed in overturning the findings of the in-house committee?
Key Takeaways
- Justice Varma has petitioned the Supreme Court against a committee's findings.
- The allegations involve significant cash discovery linked to his residence.
- Impeachment proceedings may be initiated by the Union government.
- The case underlines issues of judicial integrity and accountability.
- Public trust in the judicial system is at stake as developments unfold.
New Delhi, July 18 (NationPress) Justice Yashwant Varma, currently serving as a judge of the Allahabad High Court, has approached the Supreme Court to contest his indictment by a three-member in-house committee concerning the cash-discovery scandal.
The writ petition submitted to the apex court also seeks to nullify the communication sent by former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna to the President and the former Prime Minister, urging action against Justice Varma.
The petition asserts that the in-house committee acted with a “pre-determined bias” and deprived Justice Varma of a fair chance to defend himself.
This legal action comes amid reports that the Union government is gearing up to initiate removal proceedings against Justice Varma, with an impeachment motion anticipated in the forthcoming session of Parliament.
Justice Varma, who formerly served on the Delhi High Court, has found himself at the center of a controversy related to the alleged discovery of a large sum of burnt cash in a storeroom linked to his bungalow in New Delhi, following a fire incident on March 14.
In the wake of the cash discovery, which rattled the judicial community, Justice Varma was reassigned to the Allahabad High Court, and an internal investigation was launched to scrutinize the allegations.
The investigative committee reported that both direct and electronic evidence confirmed that the storeroom was under the covert or active management of Justice Varma and his relatives.
Strong inferential evidence suggested that the burnt cash had been removed from the storeroom in the early hours of March 15. Ultimately, the three-member inquiry committee, which included Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, CJ G.S. Sandhawalia of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, and Justice Anu Sivaraman of the Karnataka High Court, concluded that the allegations were serious enough to warrant impeachment proceedings against Justice Varma.
The committee concluded that Justice Varma's misconduct was not only established but also severe enough to justify his removal under Article 124(4) of the Constitution.
Additionally, advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara, along with other co-petitioners, has once more filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court, calling for the Delhi Police to file an FIR. They argue that the Union government, which oversees the Delhi Police, is obligated to direct the registration of an FIR concerning the alleged recovery of significant amounts of unaccounted cash from Justice Varma’s residence.
Point of View
It is crucial to remain impartial while detailing this unfolding legal drama. The allegations against Justice Varma raise significant questions about judicial conduct and integrity. The process must uphold the principles of justice and fairness, ensuring that every individual, regardless of their position, is treated equally under the law. Transparency in this case is vital for public trust and the reputation of our judicial system.
NationPress
26/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the cash discovery scandal involving Justice Varma?
The scandal pertains to the alleged discovery of a large amount of burnt cash in a storeroom associated with Justice Varma's residence after a fire incident.
What actions has Justice Varma taken?
Justice Varma has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the findings of the three-member in-house committee that indicted him.
What are the potential consequences for Justice Varma?
If the impeachment motion is passed, Justice Varma could be removed from his position as a judge.
Who is involved in the investigation?
The investigation involved a three-member committee including Chief Justice Sheel Nagu, CJ G.S. Sandhawalia, and Justice Anu Sivaraman.
What does Article 124(4) of the Constitution state?
Article 124(4) allows for the removal of a judge from the Supreme Court or High Court on grounds of proven misbehavior or incapacity.
