Should the 2003 Bomb Case Against Activist Girish Mattannavar Be Reopened?

Click to start listening
Should the 2003 Bomb Case Against Activist Girish Mattannavar Be Reopened?

Synopsis

A fresh complaint has emerged, aiming to reopen the 2003 bomb case against Girish Mattannavar, invoking new evidence and an urgent call for NIA's involvement. As the saga unfolds, the implications for justice and accountability in political corruption are under scrutiny.

Key Takeaways

  • New evidence has been presented to support reopening the 2003 bomb case.
  • Activist Prashant Sambargi is leading the call for reinvestigation.
  • Former police officer Girish Mattannavar is at the center of the case.
  • The initial trial lasted 13 years, ending in acquittal.
  • The involvement of the NIA could change the course of the investigation.

Bengaluru, Oct 10 (NationPress) A formal complaint has been lodged with the Home Secretary and the Bengaluru Police Commissioner, calling for the reopening of the notorious 2003 bomb planting case involving Girish Mattannavar, an activist who has been vocally opposing temple authorities in the contested Dharmasthala murders case.

Social activist Prashant Sambargi has submitted a new complaint, requesting a thorough reinvestigation of the case and suggesting that it be transferred to the National Investigation Agency (NIA).

In support of his claim, the complainant provided 15 videos and additional documents to the authorities.

It’s important to note that Mattannavar, who previously served as a Sub-Inspector at the Narona Police Station in Kalaburagi district, was accused of planting bombs during his time in Bengaluru for rifle-shooting training.

He allegedly placed four bombs in the toilets on the fifth floor of the Legislators’ Home and then called the police to alert them to the situation, claiming it was a campaign against political corruption. Subsequently, he and others were arrested.

However, the local court acquitted Mattannavar and his associates in September 2016.

In his complaint, Sambargi emphasized, “Mattannavar has publicly declared in several videos that he created and planted the bombs, admitting to his actions. This is evident. Despite the court's dismissal of the case, the emergence of new evidence and documents warrants a reinvestigation.”

Mattannavar has previously stated that constructing a bomb using gelatin and other materials is straightforward. The complaint insists that the NIA investigate Mattannavar and that the original bomb planting incident be revisited.

Additionally, Mattannavar has called for the arrest of Dharmadhikari and BJP Rajya Sabha member Veerendra Hegde along with his family in relation to the Dharmasthala case. He remains a key figure among activists addressing the Dharmasthala controversy.

Following his acquittal in the bomb case, Mattannavar ventured into politics, joining the BJP, but later distanced himself from the party. He has since been actively involved in anti-corruption movements and protests against the Dharmasthala temple management.

Authorities had previously apprehended his associates, Guranna Ammapura and Girish Babu, in connection with the bomb incident. The trial extended over 13 years, concluding with the acquittal of all three individuals, with police attributing the acquittal to a lack of sufficient evidence.

Point of View

It is essential to highlight the importance of transparency and thorough investigation in cases of this nature. The reopening of the 2003 bomb case could reveal critical insights into political corruption and activism, and it is our duty to ensure that justice is served based on factual evidence and due process.
NationPress
10/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 2003 bomb planting case about?
The case revolves around the planting of bombs by Girish Mattannavar in the Legislators’ Home, allegedly to protest against political corruption.
Who filed the recent complaint to reopen the case?
Social activist Prashant Sambargi has filed the complaint requesting a reinvestigation and NIA involvement.
What new evidence has emerged?
The complainant submitted 15 videos and additional documents that could support the case and warrant further investigation.
What was the outcome of the original case?
Girish Mattannavar and his associates were acquitted by the local court in September 2016 due to lack of evidence.
What role does the NIA play in this case?
The NIA may be called upon to investigate the new allegations and evidence related to the bomb planting incident.
Nation Press