Did Separatist Leader Pannun Fund Kejriwal? Sirsa's Bold Accusations!
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a striking interview, Delhi Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa accuses Arvind Kejriwal of corruption and receiving funds from separatist leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun. This explosive claim raises questions about AAP's integrity and national ambitions amidst ongoing investigations.
Key Takeaways
- Sirsa accuses Kejriwal of corruption.
- Pannun claims to have funded AAP.
- AAP's electoral wins are questioned.
- Kejriwal's absence amid investigations raises concerns.
- Public scrutiny of political ties is essential.
New Delhi, July 8 (NationPress) In a scathing critique aimed at former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), Delhi Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa has accused the party of being built on deceit and corruption. He asserts that their recent electoral victories and aspirations on a national scale are nothing but empty promises.
In an exclusive conversation with IANS on Tuesday, Sirsa addressed the contentious allegations regarding the AAP's purported Khalistani associations. He leveled grave accusations against Kejriwal, highlighting ‘self-incriminating remarks’ made by the banned separatist leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun.
“It is widely recognized that anti-national factions have been backing Kejriwal. Pannun himself stated he transferred crores of rupees to Kejriwal. Kejriwal has neither denied nor clarified if he accepted that money. There’s no further explanation needed—Pannun’s own statements suffice,” Sirsa articulated.
He responded to accusations from the AAP that the BJP-led government in Delhi was targeting Purvanchali communities.
“That’s classic AAP behavior—lying is their primary skill. To be part of AAP, one must excel in both corruption and deceit. They mislead the public with unfounded claims, while the reality is starkly different,” he remarked.
Sirsa downplayed AAP’s performance in recent by-elections outside Delhi, including in Ludhiana West and Gujarat’s Visavadar, asserting that the party's national significance is minimal.
“One individual winning a seat is not impressive. Even lesser-known parties can secure one or two victories. AAP’s gains in Visavadar or Ludhiana hold little weight in the broader context. Even in Jammu and Kashmir, AAP had a candidate emerge victorious—it’s not remarkable,” he added.
On the contentious issue of AAP's alleged ties with Khalistani elements, Sirsa reiterated serious accusations against Kejriwal, referencing Pannun’s self-incriminating statements.
He also questioned Kejriwal’s prolonged absence from Delhi amid ongoing investigations, suggesting the Chief Minister is seeking political refuge in Punjab.
“Kejriwal cannot operate without authority. Since AAP governs Punjab, he remains there, relishing the security, vehicle, and helicopter privileges. He shows no interest in Delhi unless it brings direct benefits to him. His actions demonstrate a focus on retaining power rather than serving the public,” Sirsa concluded.
–IANS
brt/dan
Point of View
This unfolding narrative raises significant questions about the integrity of political parties in India. Sirsa's allegations deserve scrutiny, as they touch upon issues of national security and accountability in governance. It is essential for the public to remain informed and vigilant.
NationPress
26/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main allegations against Kejriwal?
Delhi Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa has accused Kejriwal of corruption and receiving funds from separatist leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun.
What is the significance of Gurpatwant Singh Pannun's statements?
Pannun's claims about funding Kejriwal are viewed as serious accusations that may indicate a connection between AAP and anti-national elements.
How has AAP responded to these allegations?
While AAP has been accused of relying on deceit, they have not provided a clear response to Sirsa's specific claims regarding Pannun.
What does Sirsa say about AAP's recent electoral wins?
Sirsa downplayed AAP's recent victories, suggesting they hold little significance in the broader political landscape.
What implications do these accusations have for Kejriwal?
These allegations could impact Kejriwal's political future and the credibility of AAP as they are under scrutiny for potential ties to separatist movements.
