Why Was Kerala CPI(M) President Demoted for Lighting a Lamp?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a controversial move, the CPI(M) in Kerala has demoted Thalakkulathur Panchayat President K.T. Prameela for lighting a lamp before the 'Bharatamma' idol. This action raises questions about political discipline and ideological conformity within the party amidst ongoing controversies involving public figures in the state.
Key Takeaways
- Disciplinary actions taken by CPI(M) against members reflect strict adherence to party ideology.
- The demotion of K.T. Prameela highlights ongoing controversies in Kerala politics.
- Participation in religious ceremonies can lead to political repercussions.
- Political discipline is being emphasized amid criticisms of grassroots alienation.
- Balancing social service and political allegiance remains a challenge in Kerala.
Kozhikode, Sep 12 (NationPress) The CPI(M) in Kerala has implemented disciplinary measures against K.T. Prameela, who served as the President of Thalakkulathur Panchayat. She has been demoted to a branch-level membership due to her lighting a ceremonial lamp in front of the 'Bharatamma' idol and her involvement in a program organized by the RSS.
Prameela, previously an area committee member, participated in the event coordinated by Union Minister of State for Tourism, Suresh Gopi, which aimed to present a newly built home to a family in need.
The party has cited her engagement in the religious ceremony and her participation in the RSS event as breaches of CPI(M) discipline, highlighting their firm position on the political and ideological consistency of its members.
This incident arises amid a series of controversies in Kerala concerning public figures and the use of religious symbols.
Notably, state ministers P. Prasad and V. Sivankutty have also faced backlash for actions viewed as violations of protocol.
Agriculture Minister Prasad was notably absent from a state inauguration at the official residence of Kerala Governor Rajendra V. Arlekar, while Sivankutty departed from a meeting, which disrupted the established protocols regarding the Governor's presence.
In another controversy, a 'Bharatamma' (Bharat Mata) image was displayed at a private event within the Kerala University office complex, attended by Governor Arlekar as the chief guest.
Despite being informed by the university registrar that the event was canceled, Governor Arlekar chose to proceed with the inauguration, resulting in the registrar's suspension.
According to CPI(M) insiders, actions like Prameela's demotion serve to reinforce party discipline, indicating that any ideological deviation, no matter how trivial, will not be accepted.
Critics argue, however, that such disciplinary measures may alienate grassroots leaders and hinder social engagement initiatives.
Prameela's involvement in the house key-handover ceremony, aimed at assisting a struggling family, has generated both sympathy and criticism, reflecting the intricate balance between political allegiance, social service, and ideological conformity in Kerala's political sphere.
Point of View
The recent demotion of K.T. Prameela by the CPI(M) illustrates the ongoing challenges political parties face regarding discipline and ideological adherence. While such actions may reinforce party values, they also risk alienating local leaders and stifling community initiatives. It's essential to strike a balance between maintaining party integrity and fostering social engagement.
NationPress
12/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the reason for K.T. Prameela's demotion?
K.T. Prameela was demoted for lighting a ceremonial lamp before the 'Bharatamma' idol and participating in an RSS program, actions deemed violations of CPI(M) discipline.
Who coordinated the event Prameela attended?
The event Prameela attended was coordinated by Union Minister of State for Tourism, Suresh Gopi.
What broader issues does this incident reflect?
This incident reflects ongoing controversies in Kerala involving public figures and the use of religious symbolism, as well as the strict adherence to party ideology.
How has the CPI(M) responded to such actions?
The CPI(M) has reinforced party discipline, indicating that any ideological deviation from its core principles will not be tolerated.
What impact could this have on grassroots leaders?
Such disciplinary actions may risk alienating grassroots leaders and could hinder social engagement initiatives.
