Why Is Kerala HC Being Approached Over Delay in Suresh Gopi’s Film?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Film production company Cosmos Entertainments has approached the Kerala High Court, alleging a concerning delay by the CBFC in granting a censor certificate for 'JSK: Janaki v State of Kerala.' With its worldwide release imminent, the controversy raises questions about freedom of speech and censorship in Indian cinema.
Key Takeaways
- The Kerala High Court is addressing a petition regarding the delay in film certification.
- CBFC's objections focus on the film's title and character name.
- The film's release is imminent, raising concerns about free speech.
- The case highlights ongoing debates about censorship in Indian cinema.
- Industry responses reflect a broader discussion about cultural representation.
Kochi, June 25 (IANS) The film production company Cosmos Entertainments has approached the Kerala High Court, claiming an unjustifiable delay by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) in issuing the censor certificate for the upcoming Malayalam film 'JSK: Janaki v State of Kerala', featuring Union Minister and BJP leader Suresh Gopi.
However, the court noted that the CBFC's Revising Committee is set to convene on Thursday, and it will revisit the petition on Friday, post the committee's verdict.
The film is slated for global release on June 27.
In its petition, the production company highlighted that the film certification application was submitted through the CBFC's e-cinepramaan portal on June 12.
Yet, the CBFC has neither issued a certificate nor articulated any formal objections.
Moreover, it was emphasized that the CBFC had previously granted a censor certificate for the film's teaser trailer.
According to the petitioner, the hold-up by the CBFC stems from informal objections regarding the film's title and the character name 'Janaki', as it references the Hindu goddess Sita.
"Despite receiving no official communication or show cause notice from the respondents, the petitioner learned through media reports that the censor board has instructed changes to both the title and the character name of Janaki, citing its association with the Hindu goddess 'Sita'. This reflects inconsistency and arbitrariness in the censor board's stance, as it had previously approved the teaser without raising similar concerns," the petition asserted.
The plea argues that this delay, ahead of the scheduled global release on June 27, infringes upon the fundamental right to free speech as enshrined in the Constitution, in addition to causing potential financial detriment to the company.
Reportedly, the CBFC has requested modifications to the titular character's name, Janaki, and its removal from the film's title due to its religious implications.
The movie centers on a woman's legal battle against the government.
In response to the controversy, Malayalam director and Film Employees Federation of Kerala (FEFKA) General Secretary, B. Unnikrishnan, remarked that names of Hindu characters often correspond to deities. "If this is the scenario, we might as well refrain from using my name," he joked, noting that films adhere to the CBFC's guidelines.
Suresh Gopi has maintained his silence throughout this matter.
Point of View
The situation surrounding 'JSK: Janaki v State of Kerala' illustrates a critical intersection of art and regulation. As the nation grapples with the balance between cultural sensitivities and creative expression, it is essential to uphold the principles of free speech while respecting diverse viewpoints. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future films in India.
NationPress
25/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main issue with Suresh Gopi's film?
The main issue revolves around the delay by the CBFC in granting a censor certificate, which Cosmos Entertainments claims is unjustified and infringes on their right to free speech.
Why is the CBFC delaying the certification?
The CBFC has raised informal objections regarding the film's title and the name of the character 'Janaki,' citing its religious connotations.
When is the film scheduled for release?
The film is scheduled for worldwide release on June 27.
What are the potential consequences of this delay?
The delay could lead to irreparable financial losses for the production company and challenges to artistic freedom in cinema.
What is the response from the film industry?
Industry figures, like director B. Unnikrishnan, have criticized the CBFC's stance, emphasizing the importance of using names associated with deities in storytelling.
