What Does the Kerala HC Ruling Mean for Mohanlal's Ivory Collection?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The recent ruling by the Kerala High Court has put a spotlight on actor Mohanlal's ivory collection, declaring the government's previous legalisation invalid. This decision not only impacts Mohanlal's case but raises significant questions about wildlife protection protocols. Dive into the implications of this landmark ruling and its effects on both the actor and state governance.
Key Takeaways
- The Kerala High Court annulled the government's order legalizing Mohanlal's ivory tusks.
- Procedural errors were identified in the previous government action.
- The ruling emphasizes the importance of due process in wildlife protection.
- Mohanlal's case is part of a broader scrutiny of wildlife laws in Kerala.
- The state government is under pressure to rectify past legal missteps.
Kochi, Oct 24 (NationPress) In a significant blow to actor Mohanlal and the Kerala government, the High Court on Friday annulled the state's directive that had legitimized the actor's collection of several ivory tusks.
In response to the ruling, the actor's lawyer claimed this was merely a technical issue.
The court also revoked the license granted to Mohanlal and instructed the Kerala government to issue a new notification in accordance with the legal protocols of the region.
The court noted that the 2015 Kerala government order that regularized Mohanlal’s ivory collection was flawed due to procedural errors and had not been published in the official gazette, thus rendering it void.
Additionally, it highlighted that the Kerala government's attempt to authorize the possession of ivory did not align with legal standards.
This case dates back to December 21, 2011, when the Income Tax Department raided Mohanlal's residence in Thevara, Kochi, and reportedly found two pairs of ivory tusks.
Subsequently, the Forest Department filed a case against the actor for alleged unlawful possession of ivory.
The issue gained traction again after the government sought to withdraw the case, a decision that was later overturned by the Perumbavoor Judicial First Class Magistrate Court.
Mohanlal then appealed to the Kerala High Court to contest the lower court's decision, while another petitioner, James Mathew, sought legal action against the actor regarding the possession of the elephant tusks.
Previously, the trial court ordered Mohanlal to appear in relation to the case, remarking that the state's withdrawal lacked substance.
The actor later received a stay from the Kerala High Court. With Friday's ruling, the High Court has reinforced the necessity of due process in issues concerning wildlife protection and government action.
This decision not only reopens the legal examination of actor Mohanlal’s ivory tusk possession but also puts the state government under scrutiny to correct procedural missteps in its former actions.
Point of View
I believe the Kerala High Court's ruling is a vital reminder of the importance of adhering to legal protocols, especially in matters of wildlife protection. The decision not only emphasizes the need for due process but also holds public figures accountable to the law, which is crucial for maintaining trust in governance.
NationPress
24/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was the Kerala High Court ruling significant?
The ruling is significant as it highlights procedural lapses in the Kerala government's order to legalize Mohanlal's ivory collection, reinforcing the importance of adhering to wildlife protection laws.
What are the implications of this ruling for wildlife protection?
This ruling reaffirms the necessity for due process in matters of wildlife protection, potentially influencing future legislation and enforcement of laws regarding ivory and endangered species.
What actions did the Kerala government take following the ruling?
Following the ruling, the Kerala government has been directed to issue a new notification that complies with legal procedures concerning the possession of ivory.
