Should Media Exercise Caution in Sabarimala Gold Controversy?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Kerala High Court has called on media outlets to be more responsible in their reporting regarding the alleged gold loss at Sabarimala, stressing that sensationalism can harm the investigation and the rights of the accused. This serves as a crucial reminder of the media's role in upholding justice.
Key Takeaways
- The Kerala High Court emphasizes responsible media reporting.
- Sensationalism may jeopardize investigations.
- Accused individuals are entitled to a fair trial.
- Media should refrain from speculative reporting.
- Social media can spread misinformation.
Kochi, Oct 10 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court on Friday urged the media to exercise caution and avoid sensationalising reports concerning the alleged loss of gold from the gold-plated copper coverings of the Dwarapalaka (door guardian) idols at the Sabarimala temple.
A Division Bench comprising Justices Raja Vijayaraghavan V. and K.V. Jayakumar noted that the Special Investigation Team (SIT), established to investigate the matter, has only recently commenced its inquiry.
The court emphasized that speculative reporting could jeopardise both the investigation and the rights of the accused.
“It is the public’s right to be informed through the media, and every accused is entitled to a fair, open, and speedy trial. However, we have observed that individuals with only a superficial understanding of the issue are being interviewed, resulting in contradictory reports across print and electronic platforms,” the Bench stated.
The court also highlighted the influence of social media, cautioning that individuals with mobile phones or video cameras were disseminating information without adequate knowledge, potentially affecting the investigation and infringing on the rights of the accused.
“We urge the media to refrain from indulging in sensationalism,” it added.
The observations arose from a suo motu order based on a report from the Sabarimala Special Commissioner.
The report raised alarms that the gold-plated copper coverings had been sent for repair to Smart Creations, without prior intimation to the court or the commissioner.
The Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) had removed the coverings and entrusted them to the firm under the sponsorship of devotee Unnikrishnan Potti.
The court’s warning underscores the need for responsible reporting while the investigation unfolds, to protect both the integrity of the probe and the rights of the individuals involved.
The High Court’s directive serves as a reminder that premature or sensational coverage not only risks misleading the public but could also obstruct the due course of justice in high-profile religious property cases like Sabarimala.
Point of View
I believe it is imperative that the media acts with integrity and responsibility, especially in matters involving sensitive investigations. The Kerala High Court's call for caution is a vital reminder that our role is not only to inform but to uphold the principles of justice.
NationPress
11/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Sabarimala gold controversy?
The Sabarimala gold controversy revolves around allegations regarding the loss of gold from the gold-plated copper coverings of the Dwarapalaka idols at the Sabarimala temple.
What did the Kerala High Court urge the media to do?
The Kerala High Court urged the media to exercise caution and avoid sensationalising their reports on the ongoing investigation related to the Sabarimala gold controversy.
What is the role of the Special Investigation Team (SIT)?
The Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been formed to conduct a thorough inquiry into the allegations surrounding the Sabarimala gold controversy.
Why is responsible reporting important?
Responsible reporting is crucial as it protects the integrity of the investigation and the rights of the accused, ensuring justice is served.
What impact can sensational reporting have?
Sensational reporting can mislead the public and potentially obstruct the legal process, jeopardising the outcomes of important cases.
