Did Kerala Minister Complicate the School Hijab Issue?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Tensions rise as Kerala Education Minister V. Sivankutty intervenes in a hijab controversy at a local school, causing friction between the school authorities and the girl's family. This case raises important questions about students' religious rights and school regulations, igniting discussions about constitutional freedoms in educational institutions.
Key Takeaways
- Kerala's Education Minister intervened in a hijab controversy at St. Rita's Public School.
- Parents insisted on the right for their daughter to wear a hijab.
- Minister's findings highlighted violations of educational rights and religious freedoms.
- School was directed to allow headscarves but must align with uniform policies.
- This incident raises broader questions about students' rights in educational settings.
Kochi, Oct 14 (NationPress) Just when it seemed that a resolution had been achieved through talks involving Ernakulam Congress MP Hibi Eden, the school authorities, and the girl student's father, a social media update from Kerala's Education Minister V. Sivankutty has complicated matters.
The dispute arose when the student chose to wear a hijab to St. Rita's Public School, despite the institution's strict dress code against it.
When her parents insisted that she continue wearing the hijab, the school maintained that all students must adhere to the uniform guidelines, arguing that making an exception for one student would lead to undue pressure on others.
This issue intensified, resulting in the school's temporary closure for two days.
On Tuesday, local MP Hibi Eden facilitated discussions among the school, the girl’s parents, and school officials, leading to an agreement where the parents would comply with school regulations.
However, shortly after, Minister Sivankutty's social media announcement stated, "The government has intervened in this matter. Following a complaint from the girl's father, the Ernakulam Education Sub-District Office conducted an investigation and identified significant failings by the school authorities."
"The inquiry revealed that sending the student out of class for wearing a headscarf constitutes a serious breach of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act and violates the fundamental right to freedom of religion as enshrined in the Constitution of India."
"Consequently, the school has been instructed to allow the student to continue her education wearing the headscarf as a reflection of her religious beliefs. The school can determine the color and design to align with the uniform. The school principal and manager have also been ordered to fully address the situation and submit a report on the actions taken by 11 a.m. on October 15."
Minister Sivankutty emphasized, "In a secular state like Kerala, students should not endure such challenges. No educational institution will be permitted to infringe upon students' constitutional rights. The government remains committed to monitoring this situation."
In light of the Minister's post, the school authorities convened, with a school spokesperson commenting, "When the parents were willing to cooperate, the Minister's intervention was unnecessary. We may now need to pursue legal avenues regarding this matter," remarked the spokesperson.
Point of View
This incident underscores the delicate balance between educational policies and individual rights. It highlights the need for institutions to uphold constitutional freedoms while maintaining a respectful and inclusive environment. The government must ensure that all students' rights are protected, fostering a culture of understanding and respect within educational frameworks.
NationPress
14/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What sparked the controversy regarding the hijab?
The conflict initiated when a girl student wore a hijab to St. Rita's Public School, which has a strict uniform policy prohibiting it.
What was the school's response to the hijab wearing?
The school maintained that all students are required to follow the uniform code and argued that exempting one student could create pressure on others.
What did the Kerala Education Minister say about the issue?
Minister Sivankutty stated that the school's actions violated the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act and the fundamental right to freedom of religion.
What directive did the Minister give to the school?
He directed the school to allow the student to continue her studies wearing the hijab, while the school can determine its color and design to match the uniform.
How did the school authorities react to the Minister's intervention?
The school spokesperson expressed discontent, indicating that the Minister's involvement was unnecessary as the parents were willing to comply with school rules.
