Is Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge Right to Criticize the Centre's Foreign Policy?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold statement, Karnataka's Priyank Kharge criticizes the Centre for its foreign policy, alleging failures in national security and diplomatic efforts. His remarks sparked a heated exchange with opposition leaders, highlighting the political tensions surrounding India's international relations.
Key Takeaways
- Priyank Kharge criticizes the Centre's foreign policy.
- Raises concerns over national security.
- Questions the government's lack of communication.
- Highlights issues surrounding terrorism and border security.
- Opposition leaders retaliate with their critiques.
Kalaburagi (Karnataka), May 13 (NationPress) Karnataka's Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Minister Priyank Kharge fiercely criticized the Centre's foreign policy on Tuesday, pointing to the United States' assertion that the India-Pakistan ceasefire was achieved through its intervention.
He described this assertion as evidence of India's diplomatic inadequacy and challenged the government's lack of response to critical national security matters.
Addressing the press in Kalaburagi, Kharge remarked, “US President Donald Trump is taking credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire and claims the US is supporting Pakistan. Why is there a comparison between the economies of India and Pakistan? Our foreign policy has utterly failed.”
He further questioned, “How did Pakistan manage to obtain an IMF loan? Why has the Prime Minister converted a bilateral matter into an international issue? He declines to attend all-party meetings or engage with Parliament. In over a decade, he has not held a single press conference -- he only delivers speeches via Mann Ki Baat or from the Red Fort.”
Kharge also expressed his party's support for Operation Sindoor but critiqued the government's response to terrorist activities.
“You spoke of Akhand Bharat and attacks on Karachi and Islamabad -- what are the outcomes? Four terrorists infiltrated 250 km into Pahalgam, killed 26 individuals -- and disappeared. Where are they? Is our border so vulnerable? Where is James Bond Ajit Doval? Where is Home Minister Amit Shah? Why is no one questioning this?”
“Did those terrorists escape to Karnataka, Bangladesh, China, or return to Pakistan? This highlights the complete failure of national security under Prime Minister Modi,” he remarked.
In a sharp rebuttal, Leader of Opposition R. Ashoka ridiculed Kharge’s comments, suggesting he should concentrate on local governance instead of foreign affairs.
“Does Priyank Kharge see himself as the rightful heir to Indira Gandhi, or has Congress delegated its national communication to junior Kharge?” he asked, mocking the minister’s lineage -- Kharge is the son of AICC president Mallikarjun Kharge.
“Kalaburagi, your home district, ranks lowest in SSLC/Class 10 board results. Before lecturing on foreign policy, perhaps you could extend your wisdom to enhancing human development metrics here,” Ashoka suggested.
Offering “elder brotherly advice”, Ashoka added, “Just because your party is disenchanted with Rahul Gandhi and suddenly recalls Indira Gandhi, don’t presume you can be her successor. After 50 years of dedication, even your father couldn't become Karnataka’s CM -- how do you expect to inherit Indira Gandhi’s legacy?”
Point of View
It is essential to maintain a balanced perspective. While Priyank Kharge's allegations highlight significant concerns regarding the Centre's foreign policy, it's crucial to recognize the complexities involved in international relations. The dialogue should focus on constructive criticism and proactive solutions to enhance India's diplomatic strategies.
NationPress
27/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Priyank Kharge say about the Centre's foreign policy?
Priyank Kharge criticized the Centre's foreign policy, specifically referencing the US claim of mediating the India-Pakistan ceasefire as a sign of India's diplomatic failure.
How did the opposition respond to Kharge's remarks?
Leader of Opposition R. Ashoka mocked Kharge, suggesting he should focus on local governance rather than foreign affairs.
What are the implications of Kharge's statements?
Kharge's statements could intensify political debates on national security and foreign relations, urging the government to address these pressing issues more transparently.
