Kishan Reddy slams Rahul Gandhi over EVM, EC remarks
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Every time the Congress loses, the Election Commission becomes the villain — and every time it wins, the same institution is suddenly flawless. Union Coal and Mines Minister G. Kishan Reddy fired that pointed charge at Rahul Gandhi on Sunday, September 27, 2026, accusing the Congress leader of losing political judgement in his public remarks about electoral institutions.
The double-standard accusation Kishan Reddy is levelling
Posting in Telugu, Kishan Reddy stated: 'కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీ గెలిస్తే ఎన్నికల సంఘం చాలా బాగా పనిచేసినట్టు, కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీ ఓడిపోతే ఎలక్షన్ కమిషన్ సరిగ్గా పని చేయలేదు' — ['When Congress wins, the Election Commission worked very well; when Congress loses, the Election Commission did not work properly']. The BJP minister argued that Congress applies a selective yardstick: praise for the Election Commission of India when results favour the party, and accusations of malfunction when they do not.
Kishan Reddy sharpened the critique further, saying it is not the Election Commission's responsibility to get the Congress party elected, and that the EVMs carry no obligation to make Rahul Gandhi the Prime Minister. His message: go among the people and understand reality, rather than blaming the machinery of democracy.
A well-worn script in Indian politics
This is not the first time this argument has surfaced. After the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, Congress leaders publicly questioned EVM reliability and demanded a return to paper ballots following their defeat. The pattern has repeated itself across multiple national and state contests — losing parties challenge the machines, winning parties defend the institutions. Kishan Reddy's post is the BJP's latest, crisp articulation of that rebuttal.
As BJP's Telangana state president, Kishan Reddy carries a particular political stake in this debate. Telangana has been a contested battleground between the BJP, Congress, and regional forces, making attacks on Congress credibility a consistent strategic tool for the state unit.
What it means for the opposition's EVM narrative
The broader political arithmetic is straightforward: every time a major opposition voice raises the EVM question, the ruling party frames it not as a legitimate institutional concern but as a loser's grievance. By tying the critique directly to Rahul Gandhi's prime ministerial ambitions, Kishan Reddy escalates the attack from process to persona — a deliberate rhetorical move that shifts the conversation from 'are EVMs reliable?' to 'is Rahul Gandhi ready to accept democratic outcomes?'
Whether the Election Commission issues any fresh clarification on EVM audits, or whether the Congress responds formally, will determine how long this exchange stays in the news cycle — but the underlying argument is one Indian democracy has been having for years, and shows no sign of resolution.