Did the K’taka HC Just Quash the Stay on Witness Examination in the Obscene Video Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court has dismissed a petition aimed at delaying witness examination in the obscene video case involving Prajwal Revanna. This decision ensures that proceedings will continue without interruption, as the court emphasizes the importance of maintaining trial integrity.
Key Takeaways
- Karnataka High Court dismissed the petition from Bhavani Revanna.
- Witness examination in the obscene video case will proceed.
- Prajwal Revanna faces serious criminal charges.
- The court emphasized the need for timely justice.
- This ruling highlights the judiciary's commitment to upholding the law.
Bengaluru, May 2 (NationPress) The Karnataka High Court on Friday dismissed the petition submitted by Bhavani Revanna, which sought a stay on the examination of evidence against her son, the main accused Prajwal Revanna, in the obscene video scandal. Prajwal Revanna is notably the grandson of former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda.
The bench, led by Justice S. Vishwajith Shetty, ruled to quash the petition.
The petitioner requested a stay on the trial court's examination of witnesses in the ongoing case.
Vikram Huilgol, representing Bhavani Revanna, stated that the defense team for Prajwal needs to review over 2,000 documents related to the case. He additionally requested a week to appoint new legal counsel for Prajwal, citing the absence of suitable representation.
In contrast, Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Ravivarma Kumar opposed this request, emphasizing that Bhavani Revanna is herself an accused and suggesting that this was a calculated move to delay the witness examination in the trial court.
The SPP asserted that such petitions are attempts to mislead the court and sought permission to initiate contempt of court proceedings against Bhavani Revanna. After considering these arguments, the High Court dropped her petition.
Previously, counsel for Prajwal Revanna had expressed a desire to withdraw from the case, leading Prajwal to file for time to secure new legal representation.
The prosecution challenged this, claiming it was a strategy to delay the proceedings. In light of these objections, the Special Court mandated that witness statements in the obscene video case commence on May 2.
In response, Bhavani Revanna approached the High Court to seek a stay on the Special Court’s actions, additionally requesting certified copies of the court's proceedings. Both requests were denied.
The High Court remarked that granting a stay would undermine the trial court's authority and stated it would not consider such petitions.
On April 3, the Special Court had outlined criminal charges against Prajwal Revanna, which include rape, voyeurism, criminal intimidation, and unauthorized distribution of private images, among others.
Point of View
It is crucial to highlight that the judiciary's decision to deny the petition from Bhavani Revanna reflects a commitment to upholding the rule of law. The court's determination to proceed with witness examination underscores the importance of timely justice in sensitive cases, ensuring that the rights of all parties involved are respected.
NationPress
23/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Karnataka High Court's decision on Bhavani Revanna's petition?
The Karnataka High Court dismissed Bhavani Revanna's petition seeking a stay on the examination of witnesses in the obscene video case involving her son, Prajwal Revanna.
What are the charges against Prajwal Revanna?
Prajwal Revanna faces several serious charges, including rape, voyeurism, criminal intimidation, and unauthorized circulation of private images.
Why did Bhavani Revanna seek a stay on witness examination?
Bhavani Revanna's petition aimed to delay the examination of witnesses as she claimed the defense needed more time to review over 2,000 documents related to the case.
Who is representing the prosecution in this case?
Special Public Prosecutor Ravivarma Kumar is representing the prosecution in the obscene video case.
What does the High Court's ruling mean for the trial?
The High Court's ruling allows the trial court to proceed with witness examinations, ensuring that the legal process continues without undue delay.
