Is K’taka’s Prajwal Revanna Innocent in the Sex Video Rape Case?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Prajwal Revanna challenges his life sentence.
- His counsel questions the credibility of the evidence.
- The victim's silence raises significant doubts.
- The case has political implications.
- Next hearing set for December 3.
Bengaluru, Dec 1 (NationPress) In a significant turn of events, the life sentence given to former MP Prajwal Revanna in connection with the alleged sex video and rape incident is now being challenged. During a session in court on Monday, his legal representative petitioned for the suspension of the trial court's conviction.
His counsel raised doubts about the reliability of the evidence presented and emphasized the victim's long-standing silence. He also requested Prajwal Revanna's immediate release on bail.
The case was reviewed by a Division Bench led by Justice K. S. Mudagal and Justice T. Venkatesh Nayak.
Senior attorney Sidharth Luthra, representing Prajwal, contended that no legal action had been initiated when Prajwal departed the country. He questioned the prosecution's assertion regarding Prajwal's non-compliance in providing his personal Apple device, noting that no formal request had been made under Section 91 to produce the phone.
Furthermore, he highlighted that the prosecution failed to reach out to the mobile service provider for information about the phone using its IMEI number.
Luthra also pressed for clarification on why the victim had not come forward for three years to file a complaint. He remarked, “How did four separate cases suddenly emerge against Prajwal all at once?” suggesting these allegations stemmed from political motives.
He raised concerns about the reliability of the forensic evidence presented. “If the victim was assaulted in 2019 and 2021, why did she only speak up in 2023? And if she visited the farmhouse, why did she not reclaim her clothing?” he questioned, alleging irregularities in police procedures regarding the recovery of evidence.
Additionally, he pointed out the passing of the official who conducted the DNA testing, casting doubt on the admissibility of the forensic report.
The court proceedings have been postponed until December 3.
Previously, Prajwal Revanna stated that his ongoing detention is unjustified. Through his legal team, he argued that the prosecution's case lacks substance, and the evidence does not convincingly link him to the alleged crime, making his continued imprisonment unwarranted.
Attorney Siddharth Luthra emphasized that the conviction was rendered on August 1, 2025, and the sentence was pronounced the following day.
He asserted that Prajwal should have been afforded a fair chance to present his case before the sentencing, advocating that if the court intended to impose the maximum penalty, he should have been allowed to introduce mitigating circumstances.
“If the core of the prosecution's case is weak and the evidence does not directly implicate me in the alleged offense, then there is no justifiable reason to keep Prajwal incarcerated,” he added.
Prajwal Revanna, who was detained in May 2024 upon his return from Germany, is contesting the court's ruling based on multiple grounds, including perceived contradictions in the survivor's account and inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence.
A special court had previously convicted Revanna, sentencing him to life imprisonment and imposing fines in one of the four cases of sexual assault and rape against him.