Kumaraswamy: Nagendra quit to shield Congress over ₹84 crore Valmiki Corp scam

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kumaraswamy: Nagendra quit to shield Congress over ₹84 crore Valmiki Corp scam

Synopsis

Union Minister Kumaraswamy has turned Nagendra's own resignation statement — that he quit to spare Congress embarrassment — into a political weapon, demanding answers on the alleged ₹84 crore Valmiki Corporation scam. With Karnataka's Governor now seeking Cabinet opinion on prosecution sanctions, the controversy is entering a constitutionally significant phase.

Key Takeaways

Kumaraswamy alleged on 29 August that B.
Nagendra was forced to resign to protect the Karnataka Congress government from fallout over alleged Valmiki Corporation irregularities.
Kumaraswamy cited an alleged ₹84 crore scam involving funds meant for Scheduled Tribe communities .
Nagendra had publicly stated he resigned to prevent embarrassment to the Congress party — a claim Kumaraswamy used to press for accountability.
Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot has sought the state Cabinet's opinion on granting prosecution sanction against Nagendra , Renukacharya , and BJP MLA Gali Janardhana Reddy .
Government sources say the Karnataka Cabinet is in a difficult position over the prosecution sanction decisions.

Union Minister for Heavy Industries and Steel H.D. Kumaraswamy on Saturday, 29 August alleged that Karnataka Minister for Planning and Statistics B. Nagendra was effectively pushed out of the state Cabinet to shield the Karnataka Congress government from political fallout over alleged financial irregularities in the Karnataka Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation. Kumaraswamy, speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, said Nagendra's own admission — that he resigned to prevent embarrassment to the party — only raised deeper questions about the alleged ₹84 crore scam.

Kumaraswamy's Core Charge

Reacting to Nagendra's public statements, Kumaraswamy demanded accountability rather than optics. 'It is not important who won or who gets publicity. He has claimed that he tendered his resignation to avoid embarrassment to the Congress party. What is the reason for this embarrassment? Why was he forced to resign? What was the ₹84 crore scam? Was Nagendra made to resign to escape from this?' Kumaraswamy asked.

The Union Minister alleged that funds earmarked for the welfare of Scheduled Tribe communities had been misappropriated and distributed among individuals — a charge the state government has not publicly addressed in detail. He contended that Nagendra's exit was a calculated move to deflect responsibility away from the ruling party rather than a genuine act of accountability.

Kumaraswamy Hits Back on His Own Cases

Nagendra had reportedly countered by questioning whether Kumaraswamy himself faced legal cases. The Union Minister acknowledged the cases but dismissed them as politically motivated. 'These allegations have been continuing for the last 14 years. They have kept the cases alive, but they cannot silence Kumaraswamy. Are there any allegations that I have taken money? Do I face charges of causing losses to the government exchequer?' he said.

Kumaraswamy also noted that despite serving as Chief Minister on two separate occasions, he had not used his position to close or suppress those cases. 'If I had done anything wrong, I could have buried the cases when I became Chief Minister twice. I did not do that. I have left them open for investigation,' he said.

Governor Seeks Cabinet Opinion on Prosecution Sanctions

The political row is unfolding alongside a significant constitutional development. Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot has sought the state Cabinet's opinion on granting prosecution sanction in connection with B. Nagendra. Separately, the Governor has also sought the government's view on prosecution sanctions against former minister Renukacharya and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLA Gali Janardhana Reddy in distinct matters.

According to government sources, the Karnataka government finds itself in a difficult position as it weighs these decisions — each of which carries significant political and legal consequences for the ruling Indian National Congress (Congress).

Background: The Valmiki Corporation Controversy

The Karnataka Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation irregularities have cast a long shadow over the state administration. Allegations centre on the diversion of tribal welfare funds, with the purported figure of ₹84 crore cited in connection with the case. This comes amid broader scrutiny of welfare-fund management across several state-run development corporations in Karnataka. Notably, the controversy has intensified pressure on the Congress government, which came to power in 2023 on promises of transparent governance.

With the Governor's prosecution-sanction queries still pending a Cabinet response, the case is unlikely to recede from Karnataka's political spotlight anytime soon.

Point of View

And Kumaraswamy has wasted no time unwrapping it. The more substantive issue, however, is the Governor's prosecution-sanction query: if the Cabinet delays or declines, it will face accusations of shielding its own; if it consents, a sitting ex-minister faces trial. Karnataka's Congress government, which rode to power in 2023 on an anti-corruption platform, is now caught between institutional accountability and political self-preservation. The Valmiki Corporation case also exposes a recurring vulnerability — welfare-fund corporations in India are chronically under-audited, and when they collapse into scandal, it is the intended beneficiaries, here Scheduled Tribe communities, who pay the highest price.
NationPress
29 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did B. Nagendra resign from the Karnataka Cabinet?
B. Nagendra stated he resigned to prevent embarrassment to the Congress party amid allegations of financial irregularities in the Karnataka Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation. Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy has alleged the resignation was orchestrated to shield the government from accountability over an alleged ₹84 crore scam.
What is the Valmiki Corporation scam?
The controversy centres on alleged misappropriation of funds from the Karnataka Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation, with an alleged figure of ₹84 crore cited in connection with the case. The funds were reportedly meant for the welfare of Scheduled Tribe communities but are alleged to have been diverted and distributed among individuals.
What has Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot done in this case?
Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot has sought the state Cabinet's opinion on granting prosecution sanction against B. Nagendra. He has also separately sought the government's view on prosecution sanctions against former minister Renukacharya and BJP MLA Gali Janardhana Reddy in distinct matters.
What is Kumaraswamy's response to allegations against himself?
Kumaraswamy acknowledged cases against him but said they were political in nature and involved no allegations of misappropriating public money. He noted that despite serving as Chief Minister twice, he had not used his position to close those cases.
What happens next in the Karnataka Valmiki Corporation case?
The Karnataka Cabinet must respond to the Governor's query on prosecution sanctions, a decision that carries significant political and legal consequences. The outcome is expected to determine whether former minister Nagendra and others face formal prosecution.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 17 hours ago
  2. 18 hours ago
  3. 19 hours ago
  4. 23 hours ago
  5. 1 week ago
  6. 1 week ago
  7. 2 weeks ago
  8. 2 weeks ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google