Did Karnataka BJP Justify Criticism of Shivakumar Against Amit Shah?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Karnataka BJP's strong reaction against Deputy CM D.K. Shivakumar highlights the ongoing political tensions surrounding allegations of electoral fraud. The exchange involves significant figures like Amit Shah and G. Parameshwara, raising questions about historical practices in Indian politics. Uncover the details of this heated debate.
Key Takeaways
- Karnataka BJP criticized D.K. Shivakumar for his remarks against Amit Shah.
- Video evidence from G. Parameshwara suggests past practices of direct voting.
- Political tensions are high regarding allegations of electoral fraud.
- R. Ashoka emphasized Congress's historical issues with electoral integrity.
- Debates like this highlight the significance of historical context in current politics.
Belagavi, Dec 11 (NationPress) The Karnataka BJP has criticized Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar for his remarks against Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who suggested that former Prime Ministers Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi were implicated in electoral fraud.
The party circulated a video featuring Karnataka Home Minister G. Parameshwara, in which he claims that prior to the introduction of EVMs, some leaders would be present at polling stations and cast votes personally.
In response to Amit Shah's assertion, Deputy CM Shivakumar remarked, "Amit Shah should possess basic common sense. During their era, only ballot papers were utilized; how could vote theft occur in such a system?"
The Leader of the Opposition in the Assembly, R. Ashoka, took to social media platform X, stating, "Perhaps Shivakumar needs to grasp some fundamental facts about his own party's history before advising the Union Home Minister."
Ashoka highlighted that his senior colleague, former Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) President and Home Minister G. Parameshwara, had revealed the truth in a recorded address to Congress workers.
In the video, Parameshwara declared, "There were no EVMs back then... only ballot papers. Two or three individuals would be present to complete the voting process."
Ashoka further emphasized, "Before lecturing about 'vote theft', perhaps he should remember how Congress mastered the practices of booth capturing and ballot stuffing long before the existence of EVMs."
He also accused Congress of having a notorious reputation: ballot box stuffing, booth capturing, fictitious voters, bogus counting, and openly admitting to such practices.
Ashoka asserted that this is not merely a BJP accusation - it is Congress's own Home Minister confessing on record.
"Instead of challenging Amit Shah, Shivakumar ought to inquire with his superiors about Congress's history of Vote Theft," he stated.
The controversial video of Parameshwara emerged several months ago, and he has since denied the allegations.
Point of View
It's vital to present an unbiased analysis of this political altercation. The clash between Karnataka BJP and Deputy CM Shivakumar reflects broader tensions in Indian politics, especially regarding historical electoral integrity. Both sides present compelling arguments, making it essential for the audience to assess the credibility of claims made by influential political figures.
NationPress
11/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What sparked the criticism from Karnataka BJP towards Shivakumar?
The criticism arose after Deputy CM D.K. Shivakumar challenged Amit Shah's statement that former Prime Ministers Nehru and Indira Gandhi were involved in vote theft.
Who is G. Parameshwara and what was his role in this debate?
G. Parameshwara is the Karnataka Home Minister who stated in a video that there were no EVMs in the past, implying that past electoral practices involved direct voting by leaders.
What was R. Ashoka's response to Shivakumar's comments?
R. Ashoka criticized Shivakumar for lacking knowledge of his party's history and suggested he should be more informed about Congress's past electoral practices.
How has Congress responded to the allegations of electoral fraud?
Congress has not officially responded to Ashoka's comments, but G. Parameshwara previously denied any allegations regarding vote theft.
What are the implications of this political debate?
This debate reveals the ongoing tensions within Indian politics and raises questions about the historical integrity of electoral practices.
