Why Did the Madras HC Cancel TNFA Elections?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Madras High Court annulled TNFA elections
- Procedural irregularities cited as reasons
- New elections to be conducted by August 31
- Guidelines for transparency in elections issued
- Finalized voters' list to be available online
Chennai, July 10 (NationPress) In a significant turn of events, the Madras High Court has annulled the recent elections of the Tamil Nadu Football Association (TNFA), highlighting procedural discrepancies and breaches of prior court orders.
The court mandated that new elections be organized after an accurate list of eligible members is established. The Division Bench, led by Justice Anita Sumanth and Justice N. Senthilkumar, made this ruling on Wednesday while addressing petitions from various district football associations.
The petitioners contested the last-minute addition of new members prior to the elections, deeming it a breach of the court's earlier guidelines.
Earlier in 2023, the High Court had decreed that the TNFA must hold elections to create a new governing body, allowing the current executive committee to oversee the association's operations in the interim.
In compliance with this order, the TNFA planned to conduct elections in May 2025. However, prior to the election, four new members representing Chennai, Tirunelveli, Coimbatore, and Tiruchirappalli were incorporated into the 22-member general body, increasing the total to 26. This action ignited protests from several existing district associations, who argued that the addition of new members contradicted the court's previous mandate and the association's bylaws.
The court sided with the petitioners, asserting that the inclusion of new members before the election, without due process and in defiance of court directives, was impermissible. The judges noted that the election was executed in breach of recognized norms and procedures, thus rendering it invalid.
“The election conducted in May is hereby void. A new election should be held in accordance with the established rules,” the bench declared. Furthermore, the court provided a comprehensive set of guidelines to guarantee transparency and fairness in the upcoming election process. It mandated that the list of acknowledged members be finalized by July 21, allowing a week for objections to be raised.
A general assembly must be convened to address the concerns of all members collectively, rather than individually. This assembly should be video recorded for official documentation. The finalized list of voters must be made available online, and the entire election process is to be completed by August 31. The case is set for further hearing on September 1.