Why Did the Madras HC Restrain ‘Good Bad Ugly’ from Using Ilaiyaraaja’s Songs?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal development, the Madras High Court has temporarily restrained the producers of 'Good Bad Ugly' from using songs by the legendary Ilaiyaraaja. This ruling highlights the growing importance of copyright protection in the film industry and the need for producers to secure rights properly.
Key Takeaways
- Madras HC grants a temporary injunction against 'Good Bad Ugly'.
- Ilaiyaraaja claims copyright infringement for three songs.
- Producers must secure rights or negotiate with the composer.
- The ruling highlights intellectual property protection in cinema.
- The case will return to court for further hearings.
Chennai, Sep 8 (NationPress) The Madras High Court has issued a temporary injunction preventing Mythri Movie Makers, the producers behind Ajith Kumar's latest film ‘Good Bad Ugly’, from exhibiting, screening, distributing, or broadcasting the movie featuring three songs that were originally composed by the legendary music maestro Ilaiyaraaja.
Justice N Senthilkumar delivered the ex parte ruling while addressing a copyright infringement lawsuit initiated by Ilaiyaraaja earlier this year. The composer asserted that his songs Otha Rubayum Tharen (from Nattupura Pattu, 1996), Ilamai Idho Idho (from Sakalakala Vallavan, 1982), and En Jodi Manja Kuruvi (from Vikram, 1986) were utilized in the film without authorization or the payment of due royalties.
In his legal communication, Ilaiyaraaja demanded the removal of these tracks from the film, a compensation of Rs 5 crore, a formal apology from the production team, and a comprehensive account of the film's earnings.
The judge pointed out that the response from the production house regarding the composer’s legal notice was inadequate and “bald.”
While the company claimed to have acquired permission for the songs, they failed to clarify whom the permission was obtained from or provide any authorization details.
Consequently, Justice Senthilkumar ruled in favor of Ilaiyaraaja, granting him a temporary injunction until further hearings.
‘Good Bad Ugly’, directed by Adhik Ravichandran and featuring a stellar cast including Ajith Kumar, Trisha, Sunil, Prabhu, Arjun Das, and Jackie Shroff, was released on April 10.
The film achieved substantial box-office success, reportedly earning close to Rs 100 crore in its opening week. The court’s decision now places the producers in a position where they may need to secure appropriate rights, negotiate with the composer, or explore other avenues to comply with the injunction.
For Ilaiyaraaja, known for his stringent protection of his intellectual property in recent years, this event is regarded as another strong affirmation of creators' rights within the film industry.
The case is set to return to court for further hearings, where the court will delve into the producers’ submissions and determine whether to make the injunction permanent or modify the granted relief.
Point of View
We recognize the significance of this ruling not only for Ilaiyaraaja but for the entire creative community. This case serves as a crucial reminder of the necessity for proper licensing and the protection of intellectual property rights in an era where creative works are easily accessible yet often misused.
NationPress
08/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the basis for the Madras HC's injunction?
The Madras HC's injunction was based on a copyright infringement suit filed by Ilaiyaraaja, alleging that 'Good Bad Ugly' used his songs without permission or payment of royalties.
What are the songs involved in the case?
The songs involved are 'Otha Rubayum Tharen', 'Ilamai Idho Idho', and 'En Jodi Manja Kuruvi', all originally composed by Ilaiyaraaja.
What does the injunction mean for the film's producers?
The injunction requires the producers to either secure proper rights for the songs, negotiate with Ilaiyaraaja, or explore alternative options to comply with the court order.
When will the case be heard again?
The case is scheduled for further hearings, where the court will review the producers' submissions and decide on the future of the injunction.
What is the significance of this ruling?
This ruling emphasizes the importance of protecting intellectual property rights in the film industry, reinforcing the need for proper licensing and respect for creators' works.
