Punjab Vigilance chargesheet against Majithia reveals ₹736.96 crore money trail: AAP

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Punjab Vigilance chargesheet against Majithia reveals ₹736.96 crore money trail: AAP

Synopsis

A 40,000-page chargesheet has laid out a ₹736.96 crore money trail against SAD leader Bikram Singh Majithia, with AAP claiming his assets swelled 1,495% under the Akali-BJP government. With 300 witnesses cited and shell companies in focus, the case is set to become one of Punjab's most consequential corruption prosecutions.

Key Takeaways

Punjab Vigilance Bureau has filed a 40,000-page chargesheet against SAD leader Bikram Singh Majithia .
Investigators have traced a money trail of ₹736.96 crore in alleged unaccounted assets and funds.
Majithia's assets reportedly rose by 1,495% during the Akali-BJP tenure from 2007 to 2017 .
The chargesheet includes statements from nearly 300 witnesses and is linked to an FIR of 25 June 2025 .
The case is registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 120-B IPC.
Former ED officer Niranjan Singh was reportedly transferred overnight after Majithia's name emerged in a drug investigation, according to AAP.

The Punjab Vigilance Bureau has filed a 40,000-page chargesheet against Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader Bikram Singh Majithia, uncovering a money trail of ₹736.96 crore, shell companies, and liquor business linkages, according to Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) media in-charge Baltej Pannu on 28 October 2026. The chargesheet, submitted in connection with an FIR registered on 25 June 2025 at the Vigilance Bureau Police Station in Mohali, examines alleged accumulation of disproportionate assets during the Akali-Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government between 2 March 2007 and 31 March 2017.

Scale of the Alleged Money Trail

Pannu stated that investigators traced ₹736.96 crore in unaccounted assets and funds linked to Majithia during the decade-long Akali-BJP tenure in Punjab. According to Pannu, Majithia's assets reportedly recorded an increase of 1,495 per cent during this period. The chargesheet also documents statements from nearly 300 witnesses, which the AAP leader said constitutes the evidentiary backbone of the case.

"The 40,000-page chargesheet and statements of nearly 300 witnesses contain the details of the investigation. Those calling this action a political vendetta should read the chargesheet and examine the evidence for themselves," Pannu said.

Legal Sections and FIR Background

The case has been registered under Sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, along with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The investigation centres on alleged disproportionate asset accumulation during the period when the SAD-BJP coalition governed Punjab. The filing of the chargesheet follows a prolonged investigation that AAP leaders say has withstood attempts at interference.

Pannu Recalls Transfer of ED Officer

Pannu also drew attention to the overnight transfer of former Enforcement Directorate (ED) officer Niranjan Singh, which he alleged occurred after Majithia's name surfaced during a drug-related investigation. He argued that individuals responsible for fuelling Punjab's drug crisis must be held legally accountable. This is not the first time Majithia has faced scrutiny — he was earlier named in a separate drug-related case that drew national attention.

AAP Government's Position

Pannu asserted that the Bhagwant Mann government remains committed to its stated agenda of making Punjab drug-free and corruption-free, and that legal proceedings would continue strictly in accordance with the law. He challenged critics who have described the action as political vendetta to scrutinise the chargesheet's contents directly. The AAP framing positions the case as a test of institutional accountability rather than partisan pursuit.

What Comes Next

With the chargesheet now filed, the case will proceed through the judicial process in Mohali. Critics of the AAP government, including SAD, have contested the timing and motivation of the prosecution. Majithia's legal team is expected to respond to the chargesheet's claims in court. The scale of the alleged financial transactions — and the volume of evidence cited — means the proceedings are likely to remain a focal point in Punjab's political landscape for months ahead.

Point of View

000 pages, 300 witnesses, ₹736.96 crore — is designed to project institutional credibility, but the messenger matters: every claim here comes from an AAP media briefing, not a court filing or independent audit. The AAP government has a clear political interest in keeping Majithia in the dock ahead of the next Punjab election cycle. That does not make the allegations false, but it does demand that courts and independent observers, not ruling-party spokespersons, validate the evidence. The overnight transfer of an ED officer is a serious allegation that has never been independently verified in open court. Until the chargesheet is tested through cross-examination, the 1,495% asset-rise figure and the ₹736.96 crore trail remain claims, however voluminous the paperwork.
NationPress
28 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Punjab Vigilance Bureau chargesheet against Bikram Singh Majithia?
It is a 40,000-page chargesheet filed by the Punjab Vigilance Bureau against SAD leader Bikram Singh Majithia, alleging accumulation of disproportionate assets worth ₹736.96 crore between 2007 and 2017, during the Akali-BJP government. The case is registered under Sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and Section 120-B IPC.
How much money trail has been traced in the Majithia case?
According to AAP media in-charge Baltej Pannu, the Vigilance Bureau has traced ₹736.96 crore in unaccounted assets and funds. Pannu also stated that Majithia's assets reportedly grew by 1,495% during the decade-long Akali-BJP tenure in Punjab.
What FIR is the chargesheet linked to?
The chargesheet is connected to an FIR registered on 25 June 2025 at the Vigilance Bureau Police Station in Mohali. It covers alleged disproportionate asset accumulation during the period from 2 March 2007 to 31 March 2017.
Why does the AAP say the case is not political vendetta?
AAP's Baltej Pannu challenged critics to read the 40,000-page chargesheet and examine statements from nearly 300 witnesses, arguing the evidence speaks for itself. He said legal proceedings would continue strictly in accordance with the law under the Bhagwant Mann government.
What is the significance of the ED officer's transfer in this case?
AAP alleged that former Enforcement Directorate officer Niranjan Singh was transferred overnight after Majithia's name emerged during a drug investigation, suggesting an attempt to shield the accused. This allegation has not been independently verified in court and is attributed solely to AAP's account.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 months ago
  2. 1 year ago
  3. 1 year ago
  4. 1 year ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google