Majithia targets Punjab CM Mann over drug menace in Sangrur, cites 3 desperation cases

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Majithia targets Punjab CM Mann over drug menace in Sangrur, cites 3 desperation cases

Synopsis

Opposition pressure on the AAP government over Punjab's drug crisis sharpened on 21 September, with SAD's Bikram Singh Majithia citing three alleged desperation cases from Sangrur — Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's home district — and accusing the administration of protecting traffickers rather than victims. The BJP had levelled near-identical charges a day earlier, signalling a coordinated opposition push on the state's most politically charged issue.

Key Takeaways

SAD General Secretary Bikram Singh Majithia attacked the Punjab government on 21 September over the alleged drug menace in Sangrur .
Majithia cited three alleged cases — Mohanjit Sheron , Gulzar , and Jagseer — claiming each was driven to desperation after raising concerns about drugs.
He specifically targeted Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann , noting Sangrur is Mann's home district.
Punjab BJP President Kewal Singh Dhillon had made similar allegations on the preceding Sunday, naming the same three individuals.
Both leaders alleged, without citing independent evidence, that the AAP government was protecting drug traffickers and silencing dissent.
The AAP government had not issued a detailed public response to the specific allegations at the time of reporting.

Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) General Secretary Bikram Singh Majithia launched a fresh political offensive against the Punjab government on 21 September, accusing Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann's administration of failing to address an alleged drug menace in Sangrur district — Mann's own home constituency. Majithia cited three reported incidents involving residents who allegedly raised their voices against drugs or sought official help, only to be pushed to acts of desperation.

The Three Alleged Cases

In a post on X, Majithia named three individuals from Sangrur. He alleged that Mohanjit Sheron had spoken out against drug abuse, Gulzar had reportedly consumed poison, and Jagseer had allegedly consumed a poisonous substance — reportedly after his plea for official intervention went unanswered.

'In Sangrur, Mohanjit Sheron raised his voice against drugs, Gulzar consumed poison, and now Jagseer allegedly consumed a poisonous substance, hoping to awaken the Guru Dokhi government from its deep slumber,' Majithia claimed in his post. Majithia did not provide independent evidence for these allegations beyond the social media post.

Majithia Targets Bhagwant Mann on Home Turf

The SAD leader specifically highlighted that the alleged incidents occurred in Sangrur, the parliamentary constituency long associated with Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, calling it a pointed indictment of his administration. 'Sangrur, CM @BhagwantMann's home district, is witnessing people driven to desperation by the drug menace,' he said.

Majithia further alleged that drug traffickers were being shielded rather than prosecuted, saying the government 'has failed to curb drugs and protects drug traffickers' — a claim he made without providing supporting evidence in the post.

BJP Also Attacks AAP Government

The SAD broadside follows a similar attack by Punjab Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President Kewal Singh Dhillon on the preceding Sunday. Dhillon, also posting on X, cited the same three Sangrur cases — naming them as Mohanjeet Singh from Sheron village, Gulzar Singh from a Dalit family in Tur Banjara, and Jagsir Jaga, described as a poor labourer from Namol village.

Dhillon alleged that the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government, rather than acting against drug networks, was suppressing dissent. 'The AAP government, failing to curb drugs, is now focussing on silencing voices raised against drugs,' he alleged. He further claimed that Jagsir Singh had raised his voice against the alleged open sale of drugs in his village and was left so devastated by subsequent events that he consumed poison.

Broader Political Context

The twin opposition salvos reflect an intensifying political confrontation in Punjab over drug abuse — a deeply sensitive issue in the state that has loomed large over successive governments. The AAP government, which swept to power in 2022 partly on anti-drug pledges, has faced recurring opposition charges of under-delivering on that commitment. The SAD and BJP, both out of power, have increasingly coordinated their messaging on the issue ahead of the next electoral cycle.

The Punjab government has not issued a detailed public response to the specific allegations made by Majithia and Dhillon. How the administration addresses these cases — and the broader narrative around drug enforcement — is likely to remain a contested political battleground in the months ahead.

Point of View

But it does complicate how the public should read these allegations. What is missing from both broadsides is any independent verification of the three cases or an explanation of why the AAP government's specific drug-enforcement actions have fallen short. The real accountability question — whether Punjab's anti-drug framework has meaningfully improved outcomes since 2022 — is being drowned out by political point-scoring from all sides.
NationPress
21 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Bikram Singh Majithia allege about Punjab's drug menace?
Majithia alleged that the Punjab government under Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann had failed to address drug abuse in Sangrur district, citing three reported cases of individuals who allegedly raised their voices against drugs and were driven to desperate acts. He also claimed, without providing evidence, that drug traffickers were being protected by the administration.
Why is Sangrur significant in this political dispute?
Sangrur is the home constituency long associated with Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, making alleged drug-related incidents there particularly sensitive politically. Opposition leaders have used the Sangrur cases to directly target Mann and argue that the drug crisis persists even in the CM's own backyard.
What did Punjab BJP President Kewal Singh Dhillon allege?
Dhillon alleged that the AAP government, rather than effectively combating drug networks, was focussing on suppressing voices raised against drugs. He named three individuals from Sangrur — Mohanjeet Singh, Gulzar Singh, and Jagsir Jaga — and claimed one of them consumed poison after being ignored by the administration.
Has the Punjab government responded to these allegations?
The AAP-led Punjab government had not issued a detailed public response to the specific allegations made by Majithia and Dhillon at the time of reporting. The government's position on drug enforcement in Sangrur has not been publicly stated in response to these claims.
What is the broader political context behind these attacks?
Drug abuse has been one of the most politically charged issues in Punjab for over a decade. The AAP government came to power in 2022 with strong anti-drug pledges, making it a recurring target for the opposition SAD and BJP, who argue that little has changed on the ground. The coordinated attacks signal intensifying opposition pressure ahead of Punjab's next election cycle.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 13 hours ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 1 year ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google