Is Meghalaya's Assembly Resolution on ILP Just a Political Game?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Political games surrounding ILP demand in Meghalaya.
- Assembly resolution lacks genuine intent, according to VPP.
- Geographical context: Meghalaya is under the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation of 1873.
- Concerns over large-scale infiltration after eviction drives in Assam.
- Call for action from the Central government remains unanswered.
Shillong, Sep 12 (NationPress) Ardent Basaiawmoit, the president of the Voice of the People Party (VPP) and MLA, criticized both the present and previous administrations in Meghalaya for engaging in political maneuvers regarding the demand for the Inner Line Permit (ILP). He asserted that the resolution enacted by the Assembly urging the Centre to adopt ILP lacked sincere motivation.
While addressing the media, Basaiawmoit emphasized that Meghalaya does not require an Assembly resolution for the implementation of ILP.
“Given that Meghalaya is already included under the preamble of the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation of 1873, ILP could have been enacted merely through a notification,” he contended.
The VPP leader further alleged that significant infiltration is occurring across various regions of Meghalaya following eviction drives in the neighboring state of Assam.
He accused the state government of not taking sufficient measures to tackle this issue, which he believes jeopardizes the demographic equilibrium of the state.
The demand for the ILP—a regulation from the British era that limits outsider entry into specific notified areas—has been a longstanding concern in Meghalaya.
In December 2019, after the passage of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, the Meghalaya Legislative Assembly unanimously passed a resolution requesting the Centre to extend ILP to the state.
Chief Minister Conrad Sangma has consistently asserted that his administration is dedicated to advocating for this demand. He has raised the topic multiple times with the Union Home Ministry, insisting that ILP is vital for safeguarding the identity and interests of Meghalaya's indigenous population.
Nonetheless, the Central government has yet to make a definitive decision on the issue.
While civil society organizations and student groups continue to campaign for ILP, critics like Basaiawmoit argue that successive administrations have merely leveraged the issue for political gain without effectuating any real changes.