Mahua Moitra: Natarajan RS rejection shows Modi-Shah bid to control Parliament

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Mahua Moitra: Natarajan RS rejection shows Modi-Shah bid to control Parliament

Synopsis

TMC MP Mahua Moitra has accused the Modi government of rejecting Congress Rajya Sabha candidate Meenakshi Natarajan on a 'flimsy excuse', alleging it is part of a drive by Modi and Shah to dominate both Houses and push constitutional amendments before the 2029 elections.

Key Takeaways

TMC MP Mahua Moitra publicly alleged on 10 June 2026 that Congress RS candidate Meenakshi Natarajan was rejected on a 'flimsy joke of an excuse.' Moitra framed the rejection as evidence of Modi and Shah's bid to control both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha to enable constitutional amendments.
Meenakshi Natarajan is a former Congress Lok Sabha MP from Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh , fielded for the Rajya Sabha .
A two-thirds majority in both Houses is required for constitutional amendments — a threshold the NDA has not yet secured independently.
Biennial Rajya Sabha elections in 2026-2027 will be critical in determining the upper-house balance of power ahead of the 2029 general elections.
The episode deepens opposition unity narratives, with TMC and Congress aligning on concerns about institutional fairness in parliamentary processes.

TMC MP Mahua Moitra on Wednesday, 10 June 2026 accused the Modi government of rejecting Congress Rajya Sabha candidate Meenakshi Natarajan on what she called 'a flimsy joke of an excuse', alleging the move reflects a deliberate strategy by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah to control both Houses of Parliament and amend the Constitution.

Context

Moitra's post states that rejecting Natarajan — an Indian National Congress politician and former Lok Sabha MP from Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh — on a 'flimsy joke of an excuse' is evidence of desperation in the ruling establishment. She warned that if the BJP-led NDA fails to secure a constitutional majority across both Houses, 'their time is up in 2029', referring to the next general election cycle. The specific grounds cited for the rejection have not been independently verified.

Policy Backdrop

The Rajya Sabha, India's upper house, has been a central battleground since 2014, as the NDA steadily converted state assembly victories into upper-house seats. The coalition achieved a working simple majority in the Rajya Sabha around 2019, enabling landmark legislation including the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution. A two-thirds majority in both Houses, however, remains the threshold required for constitutional amendments — a bar the ruling coalition has not yet cleared on its own.

Biennial Rajya Sabha elections scheduled across multiple states in 2026 and 2027 will significantly shape whether the ruling alliance can approach that constitutional amendment threshold. Opposition parties, including TMC and Congress, have repeatedly alleged that the government's legislative and procedural manoeuvres are aimed at eventually achieving that supermajority without broader consensus.

Stakeholders and Impact

Meenakshi Natarajan, the candidate at the centre of this controversy, is a veteran Congress figure who represented Mandsaur in the Lok Sabha. Her candidacy for the Rajya Sabha and the circumstances of its reported rejection now feed into a wider opposition narrative about procedural fairness in upper-house elections. For the Congress, the episode provides fresh ammunition to argue that institutional processes are being weaponised against opposition representation.

For smaller opposition parties like the TMC, alignment with Congress on such issues signals a tactical convergence ahead of the 2029 general elections, even as the two parties remain rivals in states like West Bengal. The episode also puts the spotlight on the Election Commission's role in scrutinising nomination papers for Rajya Sabha elections.

What's Next

The opposition is expected to raise the issue in Parliament and press for transparency on the grounds used to reject Natarajan's nomination. Upcoming biennial Rajya Sabha elections in 2026-2027 will be closely watched as a barometer of the ruling coalition's strength in the upper house. Whether the NDA can inch closer to a two-thirds majority — or whether a consolidated opposition can prevent it — will define the constitutional arithmetic heading into 2029.

Point of View

She is attempting to consolidate cross-party opposition sentiment ahead of biennial upper-house elections that will decide the arithmetic. The reference to 2029 as a deadline also signals that the opposition sees the next two years of Rajya Sabha polls as existential for its ability to block structural changes. Whether this becomes a sustained campaign or remains a social-media flashpoint depends on how the Congress formally responds to the rejection of its candidate.
NationPress
25 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Meenakshi Natarajan's Rajya Sabha nomination reportedly rejected?
The specific grounds for the rejection have not been officially confirmed. TMC MP Mahua Moitra described the reason as a 'flimsy joke of an excuse,' alleging it was politically motivated to prevent opposition representation in the Rajya Sabha.
Who is Meenakshi Natarajan?
Meenakshi Natarajan is a veteran Congress politician and former Lok Sabha MP from Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh. She was fielded by the Congress party as a Rajya Sabha candidate.
Why does controlling the Rajya Sabha matter for constitutional amendments?
A constitutional amendment in India requires a two-thirds majority in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Without that supermajority in the upper house, the ruling coalition cannot pass constitutional changes unilaterally.
What is the current NDA strength in the Rajya Sabha?
The NDA achieved a working simple majority in the Rajya Sabha around 2019, but has not yet secured the two-thirds supermajority needed for constitutional amendments. Biennial elections in 2026-2027 will be critical in shaping the upper-house balance.
What did Mahua Moitra say about the 2029 elections?
Moitra warned that if Modi and Shah fail to control both Houses and amend the Constitution, 'their time is up in 2029,' framing the Rajya Sabha manoeuvres as essential to the BJP-led government's long-term political survival.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 days ago
  2. 3 days ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 10 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google