Why is Naqvi Criticizing the Opposition Over Bihar's Voter Revision?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a stirring rebuttal, Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi defends the Election Commission's voter revision drive in Bihar against Opposition criticism, emphasizing electoral integrity and the necessity to exclude illegal voters. He challenges the dynastic politics of rival parties and calls for genuine governance under Modi's leadership.
Key Takeaways
- Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi defends the SIR initiative against Opposition criticism.
- The Supreme Court supports the constitutional validity of the SIR.
- Naqvi emphasizes the need to exclude illegal voters from the electoral rolls.
- Opposition parties are accused of spreading misinformation.
- Dynastic politics are deemed unacceptable in modern India.
New Delhi, July 12 (NationPress) Senior BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi has sharply criticized the Opposition for their objections to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls being carried out by the Election Commission in Bihar.
In a pointed response, Naqvi stated that the Opposition is “attempting to instill fear and confusion” among the populace, as they struggle to cope with their political irrelevance and ongoing exclusion from power.
During a conversation with IANS on Saturday in New Delhi, Naqvi stressed that the Supreme Court has not imposed any stay on the ECI’s SIR initiative during its latest proceedings, thereby reaffirming its constitutional legitimacy. “No eligible voter will lose their rights. However, there need to be robust measures to ensure that illegal foreigners,” specifically referencing illegal Bangladeshis and Rohingyas, “are not included in the voters’ list,” he remarked.
He characterized the ECI’s initiative as a vital measure to maintain electoral integrity and transparency. “This drive is crucial to guarantee that only authentic Indian citizens are permitted to vote,” he noted.
Targeting the Congress and the RJD, Naqvi accused them of disseminating falsehoods and seeking to regain power through deceitful tactics.
“These parties operate like family-run businesses. The citizens of Bihar and the nation have rejected such politics. Today's India desires reform, development, and effective governance — all of which are being realized under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's guidance,” he asserted.
In a scathing remark, Naqvi referred to Opposition leaders as “parachute ke virasat vaale log” (those who inherit power), maintaining that the age of dynastic politics is finished.
“The country no longer accepts leaders who believe they deserve to rule solely because of their lineage,” he stated.
The SIR initiative in Bihar has ignited a political controversy, with the Opposition voicing fears of voter disenfranchisement, while the BJP upholds it as a move towards free and fair elections.
Point of View
It's vital to recognize the ongoing political discourse surrounding the SIR drive in Bihar. While the BJP underscores the importance of electoral integrity, the concerns raised by the Opposition regarding potential disenfranchisement must not be overlooked. A balanced perspective is crucial as this debate evolves.
NationPress
25/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)?
The SIR is an initiative by the Election Commission to update and verify the electoral rolls to ensure that only eligible voters are included.
Why is Naqvi criticizing the Opposition?
Naqvi criticizes the Opposition for attempting to create fear and confusion regarding the SIR, arguing that they are politically irrelevant.
What does Naqvi say about illegal voters?
He insists that measures must be in place to prevent illegal foreigners, such as Bangladeshis and Rohingyas, from being included in the voters' list.
What is the broader significance of the SIR drive?
The SIR drive is seen as essential for maintaining electoral integrity and ensuring that only genuine Indian citizens can participate in elections.
What are the implications of dynastic politics in India?
Naqvi suggests that the era of dynastic politics is over and that voters are no longer accepting leadership based on lineage.
