NHRC's Kanoongo slams use of minors as 'shields' at Mumbai CJP protest
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) member Priyank Kanoongo on Saturday, 3 October 2026, sharply condemned the alleged use of children as human shields during a Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP)-led protest in Mumbai on 2 October, comparing the practice to what he described as tactics seen in Syria and other 'terror-affected countries.' The NHRC has taken cognisance of formal complaints and issued directives to multiple authorities, including the Mumbai Police Commissioner and the Maharashtra Women and Child Development Department.
What the Complaint Alleges
According to Kanoongo, the complaint was filed by Satish Vaid, Head of Intervention at Seva Nyay Utthan Foundation, who alleged that children were positioned between police and protesters during what he termed an 'illegal protest' in Mumbai. Kanoongo stated: 'This appears similar to practices in Syria and other terror-affected countries, where children are used as shields and pushed to the forefront of illegal activities by the real accused to protect themselves.'
Kanoongo further said the complainant indicated the protest was coordinated through WhatsApp groups, and alleged that CJP leaders Abhijeet Dipke and Saurav Das, among others, misused children during the event. He cited a potential violation of Section 83(2) of the Juvenile Justice Act.
NHRC Directives to Authorities
The NHRC has directed the Mumbai Police Commissioner to register a First Information Report (FIR) under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). Separately, the Maharashtra Women and Child Development Department has been instructed to identify and rescue the children involved and provide them a protective environment through the Child Welfare Committee.
Kanoongo stated: 'The provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act must be fully followed throughout the process.'
Social Media and POCSO Concerns
The NHRC has also directed the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to act on the circulation of photographs and videos allegedly identifying the minor children involved. Kanoongo warned that revealing the identity of the children on social media 'could also amount to a violation of the POCSO Act,' and directed police to take action against concerned individuals should such content continue to circulate.
Kanoongo's Broader Warning
In a strongly worded statement, Kanoongo remarked: 'Using children in violent acts is the modus operandi of anti-social elements.' He added: 'We have dealt with terrorists and Naxals; we will deal with these people too... India's legal system is mighty enough to do that.' Critics are likely to scrutinise the language used, given that the protest remains a matter of contested characterisation between the organisers and authorities. The CJP's position on these allegations was not immediately available. As directives from the NHRC move through official channels, attention will turn to whether the Mumbai Police registers an FIR and how the Maharashtra government responds to the child welfare mandate.