Is Rabri Devi Facing Bias in Her Corruption Cases?

Click to start listening
Is Rabri Devi Facing Bias in Her Corruption Cases?

Synopsis

In a bold move, former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi has accused a Special Judge of bias while seeking the transfer of her ongoing corruption cases. This application brings to light serious concerns regarding judicial impartiality and raises questions about the integrity of the ongoing legal proceedings against her family. Will justice be served?

Key Takeaways

  • Rabri Devi alleges bias from Special Judge Vishal Gogne.
  • She seeks transfer of four corruption cases.
  • Concerns raised about judicial impartiality.
  • Ongoing trials involve serious allegations against the Yadav family.
  • ED is pursuing actions under the PMLA.

New Delhi, Nov 24 (NationPress) - Former Chief Minister of Bihar, Rabri Devi, has submitted a request to the Principal District and Sessions Judge at the Rouse Avenue Courts, seeking the relocation of four cases from the court of Special Judge Vishal Gogne. She claims there is bias and a lack of impartiality from the judge.

This transfer request concerns the IRCTC scam case, the alleged cash-for-jobs scandal, and the related money laundering investigations being conducted by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

Currently, all four cases are presided over by Judge Gogne, who on October 13, established charges of criminal conspiracy, cheating, and corruption against RJD supremo Lalu Prasad Yadav, Rabri Devi, Tejashwi Yadav, and others involved in the IRCTC hotel scam.

Rabri Devi's petition argues that the Special Judge shows an “undue inclination” towards the prosecution, leading her to feel a “reasonable apprehension of bias.”

“The conduct of the Ld. Special Judge during hearings of the aforementioned cases indicates a clear bias towards the prosecution, which can be observed through various instances in the case proceedings,” the application stated.

“For the sake of justice, fairness, and equity, these cases should be transferred to a different, competent court,” the application emphasized.

Additionally, it asserts that the “apprehension is grounded not in mere speculation but in specific examples witnessed during the proceedings before Special Judge Vishal Gogne.”

On Monday, senior advocate Maninder Singh, representing Rabri Devi, informed Judge Gogne that the transfer application had been submitted and is anticipated to be reviewed shortly.

This development follows a series of challenges faced by the Yadav family.

On October 13, Judge Gogne determined that charges under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act should be framed, initiating the trial in the IRCTC hotel scam.

The CBI alleges that the scam occurred between 2004 and 2009 during Lalu Prasad's tenure as Union Railway Minister, where two IRCTC hotels were leased to a private entity in violation of regulations, and prime land in Patna was allegedly transferred to Lalu Prasad’s family members and a proxy firm in exchange.

In a separate cash-for-jobs case, the CBI claims that individuals applying for Group D positions in the Railways transferred their land to Lalu Prasad’s family or associated entities in return for employment.

The ED is also pursuing actions against the family under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for allegedly misappropriating the proceeds from these transactions.

Point of View

The application by Rabri Devi to transfer her cases highlights critical issues surrounding judicial impartiality. As these allegations unfold, it is vital to ensure that the integrity of legal proceedings is maintained, fostering public trust in the judicial system. This case reflects broader concerns regarding fairness in high-profile corruption cases.
NationPress
24/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the cases Rabri Devi is involved in?
Rabri Devi is involved in four cases, including the IRCTC scam case and a cash-for-jobs case, which are currently being heard by Special Judge Vishal Gogne.
Why is Rabri Devi seeking a transfer of her cases?
Rabri Devi alleges bias and a lack of neutrality from Special Judge Vishal Gogne, claiming that his conduct during hearings has raised concerns about impartiality.
What legal grounds does Rabri Devi cite for her transfer request?
Her application states that the judge's conduct appears unduly inclined towards the prosecution, creating a reasonable apprehension of bias.
What is the significance of the October 13 ruling by Judge Gogne?
On October 13, Judge Gogne framed charges against Lalu Prasad Yadav and others, paving the way for trial in the IRCTC hotel scam, which adds weight to Rabri Devi's concerns about fairness.
What actions is the Enforcement Directorate taking against the Yadav family?
The ED is prosecuting the Yadav family under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for allegedly channeling proceeds from corrupt transactions.
Nation Press