Did Congress Expose ‘Vote Theft’ in Rajasthan with Deletion of 41.85 Lakh Voters?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Political tensions escalate in Rajasthan as Congress alleges a conspiracy behind the removal of 41.85 lakh voters' names from electoral rolls. With claims of targeted exclusions affecting marginalized groups, the party demands accountability and transparency. This situation raises vital questions about the integrity of the electoral process.
Key Takeaways
- 41.85 lakh voter names deleted in Rajasthan.
- Congress alleges a politically motivated scheme.
- Disproportionate impact on marginalized communities.
- Calls for transparency and accountability in the electoral process.
- Leader of the Opposition questions deletion criteria.
Jaipur, Dec 17 (NationPress) A significant political controversy has unfolded in Rajasthan due to the removal of 41.85 lakh voter names from the electoral rolls during the Special Summary Revision (SSR) process.
The Congress party has raised concerns, alleging a politically charged conspiracy and accusing the Election Commission of collaborating with the BJP to unjustly eliminate voters.
Rajasthan Congress President Govind Singh Dotasra fiercely criticized the SSR process via a post on the social media platform X, claiming there has been extensive manipulation of the voter lists.
“Now the entire nation recognizes that SIR, conducted in collaboration with the Election Commission and the BJP, truly signifies the theft of India's rights. Those whose names were deleted were the ones anticipated to lose. The removal of 41.85 lakh voters in Rajasthan is not merely a procedural action but a meticulously orchestrated scheme of vote theft,” Dotasra stated.
Dotasra further asserted that voters from Dalit, backward, minority, and economically disadvantaged groups were disproportionately impacted.
“The essence of democracy has been assaulted. The BJP is aware that if elections are conducted fairly, their defeat is inevitable. This is why biased voter deletions are being executed under the guise of the Election Commission and the administration,” he urged, calling on citizens to unite against what he describes as an infringement on constitutional voting rights.
Leader of the Opposition Tika Ram Jully also expressed skepticism regarding the removal of names categorized as ‘shifted’ and ‘absent’.
“If someone has moved, their vote should simply be transferred to their new location. Not everyone who has shifted has left the state,” Juli stated, questioning the rationale behind the widespread deletions.
The Congress has consistently opposed the SSR process. Dotasra had previously indicated that there were plans to delete over 50 lakh voter names during this revision.
The draft SSR voter list was unveiled on Tuesday, igniting renewed political responses.
The extensive deletions have provoked widespread discourse, with opposition leaders calling for enhanced transparency and accountability in the revision process while ongoing concerns regarding the criteria for excluding voters remain.
Point of View
It is crucial to approach the unfolding events in Rajasthan with a balanced lens. The allegations of voter deletions cast a shadow over the electoral process. However, it is essential to seek clarity and transparency from all parties involved, ensuring that democracy remains intact and that every citizen's right to vote is safeguarded.
NationPress
21/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Special Summary Revision process?
The Special Summary Revision (SSR) process is conducted by the Election Commission to update electoral rolls, ensuring that they accurately reflect the current electorate.
Why did the Congress accuse the Election Commission?
The Congress accused the Election Commission of collaborating with the BJP to selectively remove voter names, alleging a politically motivated conspiracy.
How many voters' names were deleted?
A total of 41.85 lakh voters' names were deleted from the electoral rolls in Rajasthan during the SSR process.
Who is Govind Singh Dotasra?
Govind Singh Dotasra is the President of the Rajasthan Congress and a prominent political figure in the state.
What are the implications of these deletions?
The deletions may affect the electoral rights of numerous voters, particularly those from marginalized communities, and could influence the outcome of future elections.
