Rajbhar attacks Akhilesh over UPPSC appointments, cites 2015 HC ruling

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Rajbhar attacks Akhilesh over UPPSC appointments, cites 2015 HC ruling

Synopsis

SBSP chief Om Prakash Rajbhar has cited a 2015 Allahabad High Court ruling — delivered by then-Justice D.Y. Chandrachud — to allege that the SP government's UPPSC chairmanship appointment was unconstitutional, and that 56 of 86 SDM selections under the SP went to Yadav candidates. The attack is a calculated move to peel away non-Yadav OBC voters from the SP ahead of the next electoral cycle.

Key Takeaways

Om Prakash Rajbhar (SBSP chief and UP Minister) attacked Akhilesh Yadav on 18 May over alleged community favouritism in appointments during the SP government.
Rajbhar alleged the SP appointed a person accused in an attempted murder case as UPPSC chairman , bypassing over 80 qualified candidates .
The appointment was declared illegal and unconstitutional (violating Article 316 ) by the Allahabad High Court on 14 October 2015 , according to Rajbhar's claim.
Rajbhar alleged that 56 out of 86 SDM appointments under the SP government went to Yadav community candidates.
He mocked the SP's PDA framework as the 'Party of Dimple and Akhilesh', challenging its credentials as a genuine OBC coalition.
The SP had not publicly responded to the allegations at the time of publication.

Uttar Pradesh Minister and Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party (SBSP) chief Om Prakash Rajbhar on Monday, 18 May launched a pointed offensive against Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav, alleging that the SP government systematically favoured members of the Yadav community in key appointments during its tenure in Uttar Pradesh. Rajbhar anchored his attack on the 2015 Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC) controversy, citing a ruling by the Allahabad High Court.

The UPPSC Chairmanship Controversy

Rajbhar alleged that the Akhilesh Yadav-led government appointed a person accused in an attempted murder case to the chairmanship of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission, bypassing more than 80 qualified candidates. He claimed the appointment was subsequently struck down by the judiciary.

'That appointment was declared illegal, arbitrary, and a violation of Article 316 of the Constitution by the bench of the Hon'ble Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud of the Allahabad High Court on 14 October 2015,' Rajbhar alleged in a post on X.

The SDM Appointment Figures

The SBSP leader also raised questions over the selection pattern in UPPSC examinations conducted during the SP government, alleging disproportionate outcomes in favour of one community. 'Out of 86, a whopping 56 Yadavs became SDMs,' he alleged, questioning the process that produced those results.

Rajbhar, who has consistently positioned himself as a voice for non-Yadav Other Backward Class (OBC) communities, used the figures to argue that the SP's professed commitment to broader backward-class representation did not translate into practice during its time in power.

Attack on SP's PDA Formula

Rajbhar also took aim at the SP's political outreach framework, mocking it as the 'Party of Dimple and Akhilesh' rather than a genuine coalition of backward communities. He appealed — sarcastically, by his own framing — for Akhilesh Yadav to share the 'secret' that enabled such outcomes, so that candidates from communities including Rajbhar, Chauhan, Nishad, Bind, Kevat, Mallah, Kashyap, Prajapati, Pal, Lohar, Badhai, Kahar, Dhimar, Kushwaha, Maurya, Shakya, Dhobi, and Saini could also access senior administrative posts.

Warning Over Religious Remarks

Rajbhar also criticised what he described as remarks by SP leaders against religious figures, warning of political consequences. 'You and your leaders need to stop abusing sadhus and saints at every opportunity. Otherwise, you people will have to face even greater curses in the future,' he said in his post.

The remarks appear to be a response to statements made by the SP leadership, though the specific trigger was not detailed in Rajbhar's post. The SP had not responded to the allegations at the time of publication.

Political Context

This is not the first time Rajbhar has targeted Akhilesh Yadav on the question of OBC representation. As a BJP ally and minister in the Yogi Adityanath government, Rajbhar has repeatedly sought to consolidate non-Yadav OBC votes — a constituency both the BJP and SP are actively courting ahead of the next state assembly cycle. The attack on the UPPSC record serves a dual purpose: defending the current government's appointments record while questioning the SP's credibility as a backward-class champion. Whether the SP responds substantively to the specific judicial citation will determine how far this exchange travels in the political discourse.

Point of View

Verifiable claim that, if substantiated, could do lasting damage to the SP's non-Yadav OBC outreach. What mainstream coverage misses is that this is less about 2015 and more about 2027: Rajbhar is methodically building a case that the SP's PDA formula is a rebranding exercise, not a structural shift in power-sharing. The BJP's broader strategy of fragmenting the OBC bloc — with Rajbhar as a key instrument — is visible in every line of this attack.
NationPress
22 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the UPPSC controversy Om Prakash Rajbhar raised against Akhilesh Yadav?
Rajbhar alleged that the SP government under Akhilesh Yadav appointed a person accused in an attempted murder case as chairman of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission, bypassing over 80 qualified candidates. He claims the Allahabad High Court declared the appointment illegal and a violation of Article 316 of the Constitution on 14 October 2015.
What did the Allahabad High Court rule on the UPPSC appointment?
According to Rajbhar's allegations, a bench headed by then-Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud of the Allahabad High Court ruled on 14 October 2015 that the UPPSC chairmanship appointment made during the SP government was illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of Article 316 of the Constitution.
What is Rajbhar's claim about SDM appointments under the SP government?
Rajbhar alleged that out of 86 SDM appointments made during the SP government's tenure, 56 went to candidates from the Yadav community. He cited this as evidence of systematic favouritism and questioned why non-Yadav OBC communities were excluded.
What is the SP's PDA formula and why did Rajbhar mock it?
The SP's PDA (Pichhda, Dalit, Alpsankhyak — Backward, Dalit, Minority) formula is its political outreach framework targeting marginalised communities. Rajbhar sarcastically redefined it as 'Party of Dimple and Akhilesh', arguing the SP's actual appointment record shows it served Yadav interests rather than the broader backward-class coalition it claims to represent.
Why is Om Prakash Rajbhar significant in Uttar Pradesh politics?
Om Prakash Rajbhar is the chief of the Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party (SBSP) and a minister in the Yogi Adityanath government. He has positioned himself as a representative of non-Yadav OBC communities — a large and politically decisive bloc in Uttar Pradesh — making his attacks on the SP's OBC credentials strategically significant ahead of future state elections.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 days ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 3 weeks ago
  4. 3 weeks ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 10 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google