Rajya Sabha adjourned over Ram Temple donation row; Rijiju demands apology from Congress

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Rajya Sabha adjourned over Ram Temple donation row; Rijiju demands apology from Congress

Synopsis

Rajya Sabha ground to a halt on 4 August after Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge raised alleged donation irregularities at the Ayodhya Ram Temple Trust during Zero Hour. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju's counter-demand for a public apology from Congress and the Samajwadi Party deepened the standoff, forcing the Chairman to adjourn proceedings — a sign that the Ram Temple finances row is becoming a defining fault line of the monsoon session.

Key Takeaways

Rajya Sabha was adjourned on 4 August after chaos erupted over the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust donation controversy.
Congress president and Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge raised the issue during Zero Hour, triggering protests from NDA treasury benches.
Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju demanded that Congress and the Samajwadi Party apologise to the nation for 'dishonouring Lord Ram'.
The Opposition has been pressing for an independent or court-monitored probe into the Trust's finances since June 2026 .
Radhakrishnan adjourned proceedings till noon after the din made it impossible to continue.

Rajya Sabha was briefly adjourned on Tuesday, 4 August after a sharp confrontation erupted between NDA treasury benches and Opposition members over the alleged theft of donations at the Ayodhya Ram Temple. The uproar began during Zero Hour when Congress president and Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge raised questions about financial irregularities at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, triggering protests from both sides and forcing Chairman C.P. Radhakrishnan to suspend proceedings until noon.

How the Confrontation Unfolded

When Kharge raised the Ram Janmabhoomi Trust donation issue during Zero Hour, NDA members erupted in protest, accusing the Opposition of misusing parliamentary time. Chairman Radhakrishnan intervened, reminding members that the tradition of the House required both sides to be heard, before permitting Kharge to continue. Opposition members subsequently moved towards the well of the House, deepening the disorder.

What the Government Said

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju hit back sharply, alleging that Opposition members 'do not believe in Lord Ram' and were repeatedly exploiting the parliamentary forum by raising the same Ram Temple issue both inside and outside the House. He argued that other members had important matters pending and called the approach unfair. Rijiju demanded that the Indian National Congress (Congress) and the Samajwadi Party apologise to the nation for 'dishonouring Lord Ram' before raising the issue again.

Opposition's Stand

Kharge rose a second time to reiterate his allegations, insisting that questions about the Trust's handling of devotees' offerings deserved answers. The Opposition has been demanding an independent or court-monitored probe into the Trust's financial affairs since the controversy first surfaced in early June 2026. With no resolution in sight and the din continuing, the Chairman adjourned the House till noon.

Background: The Ram Temple Donation Controversy

The dispute centres on alleged irregularities in the management of offerings made by devotees at the Ayodhya Ram Temple. The issue has remained in the public domain since June 2026, with Opposition parties pressing for a transparent audit of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust's finances. The government has not yet announced any formal probe. Notably, this is at least the second time the issue has disrupted Rajya Sabha proceedings in the current session.

Other Business Before the House

Before the uproar, the House conducted routine legislative business. Papers from several ministries were tabled, including by Anupriya Patel for the Ministries of Ayush, Health and Family Welfare, and Chemicals and Fertilisers; Pankaj Chaudhary for Finance; B.L. Verma for Consumer Affairs; Shantanu Thakur for Ports, Shipping and Waterways; and Harsh Malhotra for Corporate Affairs. Two Public Accounts Committee reports — the 52nd on the Dimapur-Kohima rail project and the 53rd on IGST exemptions on pharmaceutical imports — were also presented. Additionally, a motion was moved seeking the election of Rajya Sabha members to the institute bodies of seven AIIMS, including at Awantipora, Bathinda, Bhopal, Guwahati, Vijaypur, Madurai, and Jodhpur.

With the Opposition showing no sign of backing down and the government refusing to concede ground, the Ram Temple donation controversy is set to remain a flashpoint in Parliament through the remainder of the session.

Point of View

And both sides are playing to the gallery rather than to the record. Rijiju's 'does not believe in Lord Ram' framing is a political counter-offensive, not a parliamentary rebuttal; it sidesteps the substantive question of whether the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Trust's accounts have been independently audited. The Opposition, meanwhile, has yet to table a formal motion or a concrete audit demand that the Chair could act on — raising questions about whether disruption is the goal rather than accountability. What is missing from this debate is precisely what would resolve it: a transparent financial statement from the Trust.
NationPress
4 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Rajya Sabha adjourned on 4 August 2026?
Rajya Sabha was adjourned briefly on 4 August 2026 after a confrontation erupted when Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge raised alleged donation irregularities at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust during Zero Hour. The uproar between NDA and Opposition members made it impossible to continue proceedings, prompting Chairman C.P. Radhakrishnan to adjourn the House till noon.
What is the Ram Temple donation controversy?
The controversy centres on alleged irregularities in the handling of devotees' offerings at the Ayodhya Ram Temple, managed by the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. The issue has been in the public domain since early June 2026, with Opposition parties demanding an independent or court-monitored financial probe into the Trust.
What did Kiren Rijiju say in Rajya Sabha?
Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju alleged that Opposition members 'do not believe in Lord Ram' and were misusing parliamentary time by repeatedly raising the Ram Temple issue. He demanded that Congress and the Samajwadi Party apologise to the nation for 'dishonouring Lord Ram' before raising the matter again.
What has the Opposition demanded regarding the Ram Temple Trust?
The Opposition, led by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, has demanded an independent or court-monitored probe into the financial affairs of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. The demand has been raised both inside and outside Parliament since the controversy emerged in June 2026.
What other business did Rajya Sabha conduct on 4 August?
Before the disruption, the House tabled ministry papers, presented two Public Accounts Committee reports — on the Dimapur-Kohima rail project and IGST exemptions on pharmaceutical imports — and moved a motion to elect Rajya Sabha members to the institute bodies of seven AIIMS, including at Awantipora, Bathinda, Bhopal, Guwahati, Vijaypur, Madurai, and Jodhpur.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 26 min ago
  2. 18 hours ago
  3. Yesterday
  4. 1 week ago
  5. 1 week ago
  6. 1 week ago
  7. 1 week ago
  8. 2 weeks ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google