Sabarimala gold scam: Devaswom Special Pleader K.B. Pradeep quits amid row

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Sabarimala gold scam: Devaswom Special Pleader K.B. Pradeep quits amid row

Synopsis

Just weeks into office, the V.D. Satheesan-led UDF government in Kerala has been forced into a second embarrassing resignation — this time over appointing a lawyer who publicly defended a firm at the centre of the Sabarimala gold scam to represent the very department overseeing the temple. The post itself, critics allege, was created specifically for him.

Key Takeaways

Pradeep resigned as Devaswom Special Government Pleader on 13 June after Chief Minister V.D.
Satheesan sought his removal.
Pradeep had previously represented Smart Creations , a Chennai-based firm linked to the Sabarimala gold scam and its prime accused, Unnikrishnan Potty .
Critics alleged the post of Special Government Pleader was newly created specifically for Pradeep — the department previously had only a Senior Government Pleader.
Devaswom Minister K.
Muraleedharan's remark that 'someone who knows the weaknesses of the accused can be useful' drew sharp opposition criticism.
Former CM Pinarayi Vijayan said the appointment 'explains everything' about the new administration.
This is the second resignation over an appointment controversy to hit the UDF government, following Electricity Minister Sunny Joseph's brother-in-law's exit from personal staff.

Devaswom Special Government Pleader K.B. Pradeep resigned on Saturday, 13 June, after Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan sought his removal over a conflict-of-interest controversy that had embarrassed the newly formed United Democratic Front (UDF) government in Kerala. Pradeep had been appointed to represent the Devaswom Department in the Kerala High Court — a position critics said was created specifically for him — despite his prior legal work for a company under scrutiny in the Sabarimala gold scam.

Background to the Controversy

Pradeep had previously served as counsel for Smart Creations, a Chennai-based firm linked to the alleged theft of gold from the Sabarimala temple's gold-plated structures. Investigators had placed the company under scrutiny over allegations that panels removed from the shrine were transported to its facility, where gold was reportedly separated and diverted for other purposes. The prime accused in the case, Unnikrishnan Potty, was said to have connections to the firm.

The appointment triggered immediate political backlash, with opposition parties arguing that giving a key legal post to a lawyer associated with the defence side in an ongoing scam case was a serious impropriety. Critics further alleged that the post of Special Government Pleader for the Devaswom Department had not previously existed — the department had only a Senior Government Pleader — and was created solely to accommodate Pradeep.

Pradeep's Defence and Ministerial Remarks

Before his resignation, Pradeep had appeared before the media to defend Smart Creations, contending that the company had committed no wrongdoing and lacked the technical capability to add gold over an already gold-plated surface. His public defence of the firm only deepened questions about the appropriateness of his appointment.

Devaswom Minister K. Muraleedharan's attempt to justify the appointment drew further fire. His remark that 'someone who knows the weaknesses of the accused can be useful' was seized upon by the opposition as an inadvertent admission that the government had knowingly appointed a lawyer from the accused's side to represent state interests.

Political Fallout

Former Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on Saturday criticised the new administration's handling of appointments, stating that Pradeep's appointment 'explains everything' about the direction of the UDF government. The episode has added to early pressure on the Satheesan-led administration.

Notably, this is the second appointment controversy to hit the new UDF government in quick succession. Earlier, Electricity Minister Sunny Joseph's brother-in-law had stepped down from the minister's personal staff following public criticism over his appointment. The back-to-back controversies have given the opposition fresh ammunition to question the government's judgment on patronage and propriety.

What Happens Next

With Pradeep's exit, the Devaswom Department will need to identify a new legal representative for its Kerala High Court matters. The broader Sabarimala gold scam investigation continues, and the government's handling of the case — including the choice of legal counsel — is expected to remain under scrutiny from both the opposition and the public.

Point of View

The Satheesan administration risks cementing an early narrative of patronage politics — precisely the charge it levelled against the outgoing Left government.
NationPress
29 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did K.B. Pradeep resign as Devaswom Special Government Pleader?
K.B. Pradeep resigned on 13 June 2025 after Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan sought his removal amid criticism that he had been appointed to represent the Devaswom Department despite previously acting as counsel for Smart Creations, a firm under scrutiny in the Sabarimala gold scam case. The conflict of interest triggered a political storm across party lines.
What is the Sabarimala gold scam?
The Sabarimala gold scam refers to allegations of theft of gold from the gold-plated structures of the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. Investigators allege that panels removed from the shrine were taken to the facility of Smart Creations, a Chennai-based company, where gold was reportedly separated and diverted. The prime accused is identified as Unnikrishnan Potty.
What role did Smart Creations play in the controversy?
Smart Creations is a Chennai-based company linked to the prime accused in the Sabarimala gold scam. Pradeep had publicly defended the firm before his appointment, arguing it had no technical capability to add gold over an already gold-plated surface. His prior association with the company's defence made his appointment to represent the Devaswom Department a matter of serious public concern.
What did Devaswom Minister K. Muraleedharan say about the appointment?
Minister K. Muraleedharan defended the appointment by remarking that 'someone who knows the weaknesses of the accused can be useful.' The statement drew sharp criticism from the opposition, which argued it effectively acknowledged that the government had appointed a lawyer from the accused's side to represent state interests.
Is this the only appointment controversy facing the UDF government?
No. This is the second such controversy. Earlier, Electricity Minister Sunny Joseph's brother-in-law resigned from the minister's personal staff following public criticism over his appointment. The back-to-back incidents have given opposition parties fresh grounds to question the new government's approach to appointments.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 5 months ago
  4. 9 months ago
  5. 9 months ago
  6. 9 months ago
  7. 9 months ago
  8. 9 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google