Have the Verdicts for Bow-Arrow and Clock Symbols Already Been Decided? Sanjay Raut Raises Concerns

Click to start listening
Have the Verdicts for Bow-Arrow and Clock Symbols Already Been Decided? Sanjay Raut Raises Concerns

Synopsis

Sanjay Raut's bold claims about the judicial decisions regarding party symbols have stirred significant political dialogue. As Maharashtra's political landscape heats up, the implications of these allegations could resonate widely. What does this mean for the integrity of the judiciary and the future of Maharashtra politics?

Key Takeaways

  • Sanjay Raut questions the integrity of judicial outcomes regarding political symbols.
  • Eknath Shinde's meeting with the Chief Justice raises concerns over judicial independence.
  • Political tensions in Maharashtra are escalating as local elections approach.
  • The allegations reflect broader issues of governance and democracy in India.
  • Both the Shiv Sena and NCP are embroiled in ongoing legal battles over party legitimacy.

Mumbai, Jan 24 (NationPress) Shiv Sena (UBT) leader and MP Sanjay Raut ignited a new political controversy on Saturday, claiming that the judicial decisions concerning the contested party symbols - the ‘Bow and Arrow’ and the ‘Clock’ - seem to be “pre-determined.”

Raut’s statements came after a photograph surfaced, showing Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde welcoming Chief Justice of India Surya Kant during his visit to Maharashtra. This visit is particularly sensitive, as the Supreme Court recently delayed the hearing on the disqualification and symbol disputes involving the Shiv Sena and the NCP for an additional four weeks.

Expressing his discontent via social media and to news outlets, Raut cited the well-known movie phrase “Tarikh pe Tarikh” (date after date) to illustrate the prolonged court proceedings. He highlighted that while ordinary citizens often wait years for justice, the repeated delays in these significant political cases, coupled with interactions between the judiciary and the executive, raise serious concerns.

“The Bow, Arrow, and Clock have already been determined,” Raut remarked in a sarcastic tone, suggesting that the legal struggle is merely a formality. He further called upon “the Gods of Justice,” noting that the public is keenly observing how the democratic process is being managed. The backlash stems from a photo released by Eknath Shinde’s office, depicting the CM greeting CJI Surya Kant. Although such meetings are often labeled as protocol or courtesy visits, the Opposition argues that these interactions are inappropriate when the Chief Minister is a key player in a significant case currently before the CJI’s court.

Raut’s remarks reveal frustration within the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) regarding the legal delays. With local body elections on the horizon and the political atmosphere heating up, the symbols continue to symbolize legitimacy. By questioning the meeting, Raut aims to cultivate a public narrative suggesting that the current government may be seeking to sway judicial outcomes—a claim the Shinde-led government has consistently rejected, asserting that both the Election Commission and Courts function independently based on merit.

Raut’s comments are set against a backdrop of two significant splits in Maharashtra politics over the past three years. Eknath Shinde instigated a rebellion in June 2022 against Uddhav Thackeray, ultimately being recognized by the Election Commission as the “real” Shiv Sena and granted the party’s iconic “Bow and Arrow” symbol.

Subsequently, Ajit Pawar separated from his uncle Sharad Pawar and joined the Mahayuti government in July 2023. The EC then acknowledged Ajit Pawar’s faction as the “real” NCP and awarded him the “Clock” symbol. Both cases are currently being contested in the Supreme Court. The factions led by Uddhav Thackeray and Sharad Pawar argue that these decisions were influenced by the ruling BJP and are seeking a conclusive judicial ruling.

Point of View

The recent comments by Sanjay Raut highlight the ongoing tensions between political factions in Maharashtra. While the allegations of judicial bias must be critically examined, it is essential to maintain respect for the independence of our judicial institutions. The narrative surrounding these symbols is not just about politics; it's about ensuring that democracy and the rule of law prevail.
NationPress
24/01/2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Sanjay Raut allege about the judicial outcomes?
Sanjay Raut alleged that the judicial outcomes regarding the 'Bow and Arrow' and 'Clock' symbols appear to be 'pre-decided.'
Why is the meeting between Eknath Shinde and the Chief Justice controversial?
The meeting is controversial because it raises questions about the appropriateness of interactions between the judiciary and a political figure who is involved in an ongoing legal case.
What are the implications of Raut's comments?
Raut's comments suggest a potential influence of the government on judicial outcomes, raising concerns about the integrity of the democratic process.
What has been the response from the Shinde-led government?
The Shinde-led government has denied any attempts to influence judicial outcomes, asserting that the Election Commission and Courts operate independently.
What historical context surrounds the party symbols?
The party symbols are part of a larger political struggle in Maharashtra, with significant splits and battles over legitimacy between factions of the Shiv Sena and NCP.
Nation Press