Did SC Grant Interim Protection to Journalists Alleging Assault by MP Police?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
On June 9, the Supreme Court granted interim protection to two Madhya Pradesh journalists facing threats and assault linked to their reporting on illegal sand mining. This decision emphasizes the critical role of press freedom and the need for legal safeguards for journalists in India.
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court grants interim protection to journalists.
- Petitioners urged to approach the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
- Allegations of assault linked to reporting on illegal activities.
- NHRC takes cognizance of the situation, demanding reports.
- Press freedom remains a critical issue in India.
New Delhi, June 9 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has provided interim protection from arrest to two journalists from Madhya Pradesh who claimed to have been assaulted and mistreated at the behest of Bhind's Superintendent of Police due to their investigative reporting on illegal sand mining in the Chambal River.
A bench comprising Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan instructed the petitioners, Shashikant Jatav and Amarkant Singh Chouhan, to seek additional relief from the Madhya Pradesh High Court within two weeks.
The Justice Mishra-led bench ordered that the journalists would not be arrested in the interim, emphasizing that it would be up to the Madhya Pradesh High Court to consider any requests for extending this interim protection.
On June 4, another bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma of the Supreme Court had acknowledged the writ petition filed by the two journalists but refrained from issuing any interim order against coercive actions.
The Justice Karol-led bench pointed out that before any interim order could be made, the facts must be presented by the Madhya Pradesh government. They remarked, "If you commit a crime like murder, can we just deny you any coercive action order? We lack clarity on the crimes registered against you," urging the petitioners’ counsel to include Bhind’s SP in the petition.
The journalists stated they were compelled to leave their hometown due to severe threats received after uncovering illegal sand mining practices in the Chambal River, allegedly facilitated by local police.
In their writ petition to the Supreme Court, they identified IPS officer Asit Yadav and his team as key figures responsible for the alleged abuses, asserting that the actions were retaliatory due to their investigative efforts.
They reported incidents of custodial assault, caste-based abuse, kidnapping, and ongoing harassment from the Bhind police.
Meanwhile, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has taken suo motu cognizance of the violent treatment faced by the two journalists, who reportedly face serious threats to their safety from the Bhind police.
The NHRC issued a notice to the Director General of Police (DGP) of Madhya Pradesh, demanding a comprehensive report on the situation within two weeks. The commission noted a press release from the Press Club of India, indicating that if the claims are accurate, they constitute a grave violation of the journalists' human rights.
Point of View
It is essential to recognize the ongoing threats faced by journalists in India. This incident underscores the pressing need for robust legal protections for media professionals, ensuring their ability to report without fear of retaliation. Upholding press freedom is vital for a healthy democracy.
NationPress
27/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the Supreme Court to intervene in this case?
The Supreme Court intervened due to serious allegations against the Madhya Pradesh police regarding the assault and harassment of journalists investigating illegal sand mining.
How does this case impact press freedom in India?
This case highlights the risks journalists face in India and emphasizes the need for stronger legal protections to safeguard media freedom.
What should journalists do if they face threats?
Journalists should document the threats, seek legal advice, and consider reporting the matter to human rights organizations or legal bodies for assistance.
