SC flags Lakhimpur Kheri trial delay, orders witness protection compliance

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
SC flags Lakhimpur Kheri trial delay, orders witness protection compliance

Synopsis

Nearly four years after eight people were killed in Lakhimpur Kheri, the Supreme Court is still pushing a stalled trial forward. With 72 witnesses yet to be examined in the main case and allegations of police-led witness intimidation now on record, the apex court's patience has visibly worn thin.

Key Takeaways

The Supreme Court on 8 May 2025 expressed disappointment over the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence trial stalling for two months without a single witness being examined.
In the principal trial, 44 witnesses have been examined and 72 remain ; in the connected mob violence trial, 9 of 35 witnesses are still pending.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan alleged police were intimidating witnesses before hearing dates.
The court directed the trial judge to secure witness attendance and ensure compliance with the witness protection scheme .
The investigating officer has been given four weeks to complete the probe into witness intimidation allegations.
The case stems from October 2021 violence in Tikunia, Lakhimpur Kheri , in which eight people , including four farmers, were killed.

The Supreme Court on Friday, 8 May 2025, expressed sharp disappointment over the sluggish pace of the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence trial and directed the trial court to take all lawful measures to secure witness attendance while ensuring strict compliance with the witness protection scheme. The apex court's intervention comes amid alarming allegations that witnesses are being intimidated ahead of hearing dates.

What the Supreme Court Said

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi expressed concern that not a single prosecution witness had been examined in the past two months, despite the issuance of both bailable and non-bailable warrants by the trial court. The bench observed: "We are disappointed to note that the so-called status report does not assign any reason for the non-production of witnesses on previous dates. No witness appears to have been examined for two months."

The bench also questioned the prosecution's approach, remarking: "What have you done from March till today? Instead of summoning three-four witnesses, summon seven-eight witnesses. At least those who are present can be examined."

State of the Trial

The Uttar Pradesh state government informed the apex court that in the principal trial relating to the deaths of protesting farmers, 44 prosecution witnesses have been examined and 15 witnesses discharged, while 72 witnesses still remain to be examined. In the connected trial relating to the subsequent mob violence, 26 out of 35 witnesses had already deposed, with nine witnesses still pending examination.

Notably, the apex court also recorded that despite a witness appearing before the trial court on one occasion, the prosecution chose not to examine that witness — a lapse that contributed to further delay.

Allegations of Witness Intimidation

Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the victims' families, alleged before the Supreme Court that witnesses were being actively intimidated. "Police are threatening witnesses before the date of hearing, that is why they are not coming," Bhushan submitted. The apex court took note of a third connected criminal proceeding concerning these allegations of witness intimidation.

Senior advocate Siddharth Dave, appearing for Ashish Mishra — the prime accused and son of former Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Ajay Mishra Teni — also confirmed that no witness examination had taken place recently despite coercive processes being issued. "No witness has been examined for the last two months. Bailable warrants issued, even non-bailable warrants issued, but no one has appeared," Dave told the court.

Court Directions and What Happens Next

Recording its dissatisfaction with the status report filed by state authorities, the Supreme Court directed the presiding judge conducting both trials to take lawful measures for securing witness attendance and to ensure compliance with the witness protection mechanism. The trial court was further directed to endeavour to conclude both criminal trials in a time-bound manner.

Regarding the pending investigation into witness intimidation allegations, the bench directed the investigating officer to conclude the remaining probe and submit the final report before the competent trial court within four weeks. This is not the first time the apex court has flagged delays — in earlier orders, it had asked the prosecution to drop unnecessary formal witnesses to expedite proceedings.

Background: The 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri Violence

In October 2021, eight people were killed in Tikunia in Lakhimpur Kheri district when violence erupted during protests against the visit of Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya. According to the UP Police FIR, four farmers were mowed down by an SUV in which Ashish Mishra was reportedly seated. The case has since drawn sustained scrutiny from the Supreme Court over the pace of justice delivery.

Point of View

The Lakhimpur Kheri case is a textbook study in how high-profile criminal trials can be hollowed out by procedural attrition. The Supreme Court's repeated interventions have kept the case alive, but the pattern — warrants issued, witnesses absent, status reports filed without explanation — suggests systemic resistance rather than administrative failure. The allegation that police are themselves intimidating witnesses, if borne out, would represent a profound institutional breakdown. The court's four-week deadline on the intimidation probe is the most consequential direction in this hearing; how the UP government responds will reveal whether accountability is being pursued or managed.
NationPress
10 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Supreme Court order in the Lakhimpur Kheri case on 8 May 2025?
The Supreme Court directed the trial court to take all lawful measures to secure witness attendance and ensure compliance with the witness protection scheme. It also gave the investigating officer four weeks to complete the probe into witness intimidation allegations.
Why has the Lakhimpur Kheri trial been delayed?
No prosecution witness was examined for two months despite bailable and non-bailable warrants being issued. Advocate Prashant Bhushan alleged that police were intimidating witnesses before hearing dates, preventing them from appearing.
Who is Ashish Mishra and what is his role in the case?
Ashish Mishra is the prime accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case and the son of former Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Ajay Mishra Teni. According to the UP Police FIR, he was seated in the SUV that allegedly mowed down four protesting farmers in October 2021.
How many witnesses remain to be examined in the Lakhimpur Kheri trial?
In the principal trial relating to the farmers' deaths, 72 witnesses remain to be examined. In the connected mob violence trial, 9 out of 35 witnesses are still pending deposition.
What happened in the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence?
In October 2021, eight people were killed in Tikunia, Lakhimpur Kheri, when violence broke out during farmers' protests against UP Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya's visit. Four farmers were allegedly mowed down by an SUV in which Ashish Mishra was reportedly seated.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 days ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 4 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 7 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google