SC irked as ED seeks adjournment in Chaitanya Baghel bail plea
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Supreme Court on Wednesday, 17 June deferred its hearing on the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) plea seeking cancellation of bail granted to Chaitanya Baghel, son of former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel, in the alleged multi-crore Chhattisgarh liquor scam case. The bench expressed open displeasure after the ED sought more time, having itself pushed for an urgent listing.
Court's Sharp Rebuke
A bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice V. Mohana adjourned the matter after the ED's counsel requested additional time to argue its case. The bench did not hold back its frustration, remarking: 'First, it's list it, list it; then comes the adjournment. We read files overnight for these cases.' The remark pointedly called out the agency's pattern of seeking urgent listings only to then seek delays.
Background: The Bail Order Under Challenge
The ED has filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Chhattisgarh High Court order that granted bail to Chaitanya Baghel under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In January 2026, a single-judge bench of Justice Arvind Kumar Verma enlarged Chaitanya Baghel on bail. He had been arrested by the ED in July 2025 during its probe into the alleged scam, said to have operated between 2019 and 2023.
The High Court had observed that Chaitanya Baghel was 'not alleged to have held any official or statutory position' in the Excise Department or state-run liquor corporations. It further noted that the allegations rested primarily on statements recorded under Section 50 of the PMLA and on his alleged association with other accused — with the role attributed to him described as 'largely inferential and derivative in nature' and not founded on any specific overt act directly attributable to him.
Justice Verma had held that 'continued incarceration of the applicant would convert the presumption of innocence into a hollow promise,' noting that the trial was unlikely to conclude soon given the large number of accused, witnesses, and documents involved.
What the ED Alleges
The ED has alleged that Chaitanya Baghel played a central role in the liquor syndicate and handled nearly ₹1,000 crore in proceeds of crime. According to the agency, the racket involved illegal commissions on liquor sales, unaccounted liquor production, and diversion of excise revenue, causing substantial losses to the state exchequer.
The alleged scam, estimated to involve proceeds running into thousands of crores of rupees, is being jointly investigated by the ED and the Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau/Economic Offences Wing (ACB/EOW). Multiple charge sheets and prosecution complaints have been filed naming several politicians, bureaucrats, and businessmen.
What Happens Next
The Supreme Court has deferred the matter without setting an immediate fresh date for arguments. The ED will need to be ready to argue its plea at the next listing — and the bench's remarks signal that further adjournments are unlikely to be received favourably. The case remains a high-profile test of PMLA bail jurisprudence, particularly around the threshold for cancelling bail already granted by a High Court.