Will Hemant Soren Face Legal Trials Following Jharkhand HC's Ruling?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a critical ruling by the Jharkhand High Court, Chief Minister Hemant Soren faces legal challenges as the trial concerning his alleged non-compliance with ED summonses progresses. This raises questions about his political future amidst allegations of a land scam.
Key Takeaways
- The Jharkhand High Court has permitted the trial against Hemant Soren to continue.
- Soren faces allegations of ignoring ED summonses in a land scam case.
- He has been granted exemption from personal court appearances.
- The case has significant implications for political accountability in Jharkhand.
Ranchi, Jan 15 (NationPress) In a significant development for Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren, the High Court has permitted the trial to advance concerning accusations of disregarding summonses issued by the ED in an alleged land fraud case.
A single-judge bench headed by Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary rejected Soren’s plea to invalidate the ongoing proceedings before the MP-MLA special court. Nevertheless, the High Court did grant him an exemption from appearing in person at court.
The MP-MLA court had commenced judicial actions after acknowledging a complaint from the ED. In response to this, Soren had appealed to the High Court for the dismissal of the case.
The ED had lodged its complaint with the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) court in February 2024, asserting that Soren had repeatedly neglected to comply with summonses for questioning regarding the alleged land scam associated with Ranchi’s Bargain circle.
The agency reported that the initial summons was issued on August 14, 2023, followed by further notices on August 19, September 1, September 17, September 26, December 11, and December 29 in 2023, along with January 13, January 22, and January 27 in 2024. In total, ten summonses were issued, yet Soren appeared personally only on two occasions.
The ED has claimed that this alleged non-compliance constitutes breaches under Section 63 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and Section 174 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
The CJM court took cognizance of the complaint on March 4, 2024, after which the case was transferred to the MP-MLA special court.
In contesting the cognizance order, Soren argued before the High Court that he had provided written responses to the ED for the summonses he could not attend and had appeared for new notices after previous summonses had expired.
He also asserted that the agency had issued repeated summonses unnecessarily and with malicious intent.
Point of View
It is crucial to remain unbiased in reporting the ongoing legal proceedings involving Chief Minister Hemant Soren. The developments in this case not only underline the legal challenges faced by politicians but also reflect on the broader implications for governance in Jharkhand.
NationPress
16/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the basis of the ED's case against Hemant Soren?
The Enforcement Directorate alleges that Hemant Soren failed to comply with multiple summonses related to questioning in an alleged land scam.
What did the High Court decide regarding Soren's petition?
The High Court dismissed Soren's petition to quash the proceedings against him, allowing the trial to advance.
How many summonses were issued to Soren?
A total of ten summonses were issued to Soren, of which he appeared in person only twice.
Is Hemant Soren required to appear personally in court?
The High Court has granted Soren an exemption from personal appearance in court.
What legal provisions are being referenced in this case?
The allegations include violations under Section 63 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and Section 174 of the Indian Penal Code.
