Is Shiv Sena(UBT) Right to Challenge Trump’s Role in India-Pakistan Ceasefire?

Mumbai, May 12 (NationPress) The Shiv Sena(UBT) has voiced significant concerns regarding US President Donald Trump’s 'intervention' in the ongoing conflict between India and Pakistan and his announcement of a ceasefire. In a pointed editorial published in its official publication 'Saamana', the Shiv Sena(UBT) questioned, "Who granted the President this authority? Did President Trump purchase India's sovereignty? For what purpose? Exactly, "What arrangement was established? The nation deserves clarity."

“The Indian Army and Air Force have successfully thwarted the drones and missiles launched by Pakistan. They have delivered a strong response to Pakistani aggression, yet the precise locations of the six terrorists responsible for the Pahalgam attack remain unknown. The catalyst for the India-Pakistan conflict was the murder of 26 innocent individuals by these six terrorists. However, President Trump has intervened. While he desires peace between India and Pakistan, he is not a figure like Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, or Nelson Mandela. He is a businessman. There seems to be a partnership between Indian and American business leaders. President Trump has not halted the Israel-Palestine conflict. By openly supporting Israel, he observes the suffering of Gaza while preaching peace to India," the editorial stated.

“India is a sovereign nation. No foreign entity has the authority to meddle in our affairs, yet President Trump has chosen to intervene in the India-Pakistan situation, and India has seemingly accepted his ceasefire offer. Trump announced on his X account that India had consented to the ceasefire. Until that moment, the citizens of India and the Indian Armed Forces were unaware of this ceasefire. Who bestowed this authority upon President Trump?" the editorial questioned.

"In accordance with the Simla Agreement established post the 1971 Indo-Pak war, external interference was prohibited. However, the current Prime Minister has disregarded this agreement, succumbing to Trump's pressure and endorsing the ceasefire. But was 'Operation Sindoor' or Pakistan's retaliation concluded? The nation deserves answers," the editorial stated.

"Twelve innocent civilians were killed in a Pakistani strike in Poonch-Rajouri. What was their fault? The eagerness of Prime Minister Modi amidst the India-Pakistan conflict indicates a lack of resolve. While Modi's fervor was invigorating the nation and the armed forces, President Trump brokered a deal. Seven Indian soldiers, including Murali Naik from Mumbai, aged just 23, lost their lives in the Pakistani assault. Murali Naik and Dinesh Sharma bravely defended against Pakistani fire in the Uri sector. Dinesh Sharma also exhibited remarkable valor in the Poonch sector. Thousands of such soldiers like Dinesh and Murali are stationed on the Indian border, risking their lives for our country. Murali Naik's parents live in a humble home in Ghatkopar and tirelessly work to sustain their family. As a martyr, Murali's father expressed pride in his son's service, yet sorrow for their struggles. Those caught up in the political fervor of war should remember this," the editorial noted.

"Those who are fueled by the political climate of war have not sacrificed for the nation nor exhibited bravery. Yet, propaganda suggests that this conflict is being fought by the Bharatiya Janata Party and its affiliates. The government has curtailed news agencies and certain media channels. Even as the ceasefire unfolds, the Defence Minister continues to bring up Operation Sindoor. However, critical questions linger: How did those six terrorists infiltrate and evade capture? Why has there been no trace of them? These inquiries require answers. Seven terrorists from the organization Jaish-e-Mohammed, who attempted to cross into India from the Samba sector in Jammu, were neutralized by the valiant soldiers of the Border Security Force. These soldiers also dismantled the Pakistani outpost, which is commendable and should be known by every Indian citizen," the editorial concluded.

"Pakistan remains resolute, as their Prime Minister exacerbates the anguish of the 26 families affected by the Pahalgam attack by claiming, 'we won the war.' Meanwhile, the Prime Minister, Defence Minister, and Home Minister are absent from the scene. Before the conflict began, Home Minister Amit Shah asserted in Parliament that Pakistan-occupied Kashmir is part of India, and they are willing to sacrifice their lives for it. Yet, when the Indian Army advanced to reclaim Kashmir, Modi and Shah capitulated to President Trump and accepted the ceasefire. Have the sacrifices of seven soldiers been in vain?" the Shiv Sena (UBT) editorial questioned.

"While it is commendable to halt the infiltration of seven Jaish terrorists at the Indian border, how did the terrorists who attacked the tourist destination of Pahalgam manage to infiltrate? How were they allowed to roam freely? How were they able to devastate the lives of 26 families? These are pressing questions that demand answers," the editorial concluded.