Should CM and Ministers Face Jail Time? Jharkhand HC Halts Minor Minerals Auction Until PESA Law is Implemented

Click to start listening
Should CM and Ministers Face Jail Time? Jharkhand HC Halts Minor Minerals Auction Until PESA Law is Implemented

Synopsis

The Jharkhand High Court's recent ruling puts a halt on minor mineral auctions, highlighting the government's delays in enforcing vital laws. The court's stern approach raises questions about accountability and compliance with constitutional mandates.

Key Takeaways

  • Jharkhand High Court halts minor mineral auctions.
  • Government criticized for delaying PESA implementation.
  • Chief Justice questioned government accountability.
  • Local bodies' rights under 73rd Amendment emphasized.
  • All auctions remain barred until further notice.

Ranchi, Sep 9 (NationPress) The Jharkhand High Court issued a definitive order this Tuesday, placing a full ban on the auction of all minor minerals, including sand ghats, across the state.

The court criticized the state government for its procrastination in enforcing the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), emphasizing that the stay on auctions will persist until the law comes into effect.

A division bench led by Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Rajesh Shankar was reviewing a contempt petition brought forth by the Adivasi Intellectual Forum, which highlighted the government's failure to establish and announce PESA regulations despite a court order from July 2024.

During the proceedings, Manoj Kumar, the Principal Secretary of the Panchayati Raj Department, appeared before the bench.

Unimpressed by his justifications, the bench sternly questioned, “Are you suggesting we should imprison the Chief Minister and ministers?”

The court remarked that the state government was compromising the essence of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment, which grants local bodies in tribal regions authority over land and natural resources. It was noted that the government’s delays were undermining constitutional duties.

The government informed the bench that a draft of the PESA rules was ready, and feedback had been requested. The subsequent step would be obtaining approval from the cabinet and the Chief Minister.

However, the bench expressed “significant dissatisfaction” with this response, interpreting it as a blatant attempt to postpone necessary actions.

Senior advocate Ajit Kumar, representing the petitioner, argued that the government was intentionally delaying progress while simultaneously facilitating long-term leases and auctions of sand ghats and minor mineral mines.

“By the time the rules are established, there will be nothing left for the gram sabhas,” he asserted.

In July 2024, the High Court had mandated the government to implement PESA rules within two months, ensuring alignment with the objectives of the 73rd Amendment and the provisions of the PESA Act. However, due to continued non-compliance, the Forum filed a contempt petition.

Previously, on August 5, the same bench had interrogated the government regarding the non-implementation of PESA, despite court directives, and ordered it to submit a comprehensive affidavit.

Following Tuesday’s ruling, all auctions of minor minerals in Jharkhand are now prohibited until further notice.

Point of View

I believe the Jharkhand High Court's decision serves as a critical reminder of the need for government accountability. The delays in implementing PESA not only undermine constitutional rights but also hamper local governance. This situation highlights the importance of adhering to legal frameworks that protect community interests.
NationPress
09/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the reason behind the court's stay on auctions?
The Jharkhand High Court stayed the auctions due to the state government's failure to implement the PESA law, which empowers local bodies in tribal areas.
What is the PESA Act?
The PESA Act, or Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, aims to extend the provisions of the Panchayati Raj system to Scheduled Areas, granting local communities control over land and natural resources.
What are the implications of this ruling for local communities?
This ruling protects the interests of local communities by preventing the auctioning of resources until the PESA law is fully implemented.
What actions did the court take against the government?
The court expressed displeasure with the government's delay tactics and questioned whether imprisonment for the Chief Minister and ministers was a consideration.
When was the PESA rule supposed to be implemented?
The High Court ordered the government to notify PESA rules within two months back in July 2024.