Amit Shah to Rahul Gandhi: Stop blaming SIR, prepare for 2029 defeat
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Tuesday, 13 October launched a withering attack on Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi and the Indian National Congress, dismissing the party's repeated allegations against the electoral process as a calculated attempt to paper over a string of poll defeats. Shah's remarks came on the heels of the Bharatiya Janata Party's sweeping victory in Gujarat's civic elections.
Shah's Direct Warning to Congress
In an unsparing political broadside, Shah declared: '2029 mein haar ka mann bana lein' — 'Make up your mind to face defeat in 2029' — asserting that the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance would return to power with a thumping majority under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership. He challenged Gandhi to explain whether the Congress would now blame the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls for its latest rout in Gujarat's civic polls as well.
Shah pointedly noted that the current SIR exercise commenced only after the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, yet the Congress had been losing elections under Gandhi's stewardship well before the revision began. 'Will Rahul Gandhi now say that the Congress lost Gujarat because of SIR?' he asked, urging the party to examine its own political shortcomings rather than question constitutional institutions.
Gujarat Civic Poll Results: BJP's Dominant Show
The BJP secured 38 of the 44 seats in the Gandhinagar Municipal Corporation, also retaining control of the Thara and Okha municipalities. Shah underscored that the party's vote share in the Gandhinagar civic body had risen by 10 percentage points, calling it a reflection of continued voter confidence in Modi's leadership.
Taking a dig at the Congress, Shah noted the party had last won Gujarat in 1985 — 41 years ago — and had failed to regain a political foothold since. He also targeted the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), claiming its candidates forfeited their deposits on all 32 seats it contested in the Gujarat civic elections.
A National Pattern, Shah Argues
The Home Minister marshalled results from multiple states to build his case against the Congress. In bypolls across Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, and Puducherry, he said the Congress failed to win a single seat. In Assam's Nagaon, the BJP reportedly wrested a Lok Sabha seat from the Congress; in West Bengal, the BJP claimed victories in Nandigram and wrested the Rejinagar seat from the opposition.
In Rajasthan's local body elections, Shah claimed the BJP won 90 per cent of Municipal Corporation seats, 66 per cent of Municipal Council seats, and 65 per cent of Municipal Board seats. In Tripura's Gram Samiti elections — conducted through ballot boxes — he said the NDA won approximately 4,000 of 4,600 seats, pointedly noting the ballot-box format to rebut claims of electronic voting irregularities.
Shah further stated that the Congress had failed to win in Tripura for 30 years and in West Bengal for 56 years, questioning how the party could continue to attribute such long-running electoral failure to democratic institutions.
SIR Row and the Infiltration Allegation
On the ongoing controversy over the SIR exercise — which prompted Gandhi to demand the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar — Shah alleged that the Congress was opposing the voter-list revision not out of concern for genuine electors but to 'protect infiltrators' and 'undermine the electoral process'. He claimed the public had seen through this political strategy and would reject it.
Gandhi's Rally Dismissed
Shah also dismissed Gandhi's recent efforts to rally opposition parties, arguing that assembling workers from 14 political parties and drawing a crowd of 8,000 people did not make someone the voice of the country. 'The voice of the country is in its villages, fields, forests and far-flung areas,' he said, asserting that the Congress leadership had lost touch with ordinary voters.
With the BJP's national electoral record growing and the 2029 general elections on the horizon, Shah's remarks signal an early and aggressive framing of the political narrative ahead of a pivotal cycle.