Is CM Vijayan Facing Embarrassment Over Sudhakaran's Remarks on the Sabarimala Gold Controversy?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a surprising turn of events, veteran CPI-M leader G. Sudhakaran has publicly criticized CM Pinarayi Vijayan's government regarding the Sabarimala gold controversy. His remarks, made during a Congress event, highlight internal party dissent and raise questions about the current administration's integrity amidst ongoing investigations.
Key Takeaways
- Sudhakaran's remarks indicate internal discord within CPI-M.
- The Sabarimala gold controversy raises serious governance questions.
- Timing of the criticism coincides with a high-level investigation.
- Sudhakaran's history within the party is complex and impactful.
- The incident reflects broader issues within political accountability.
Thiruvananthapuram, Oct 6 (NationPress) The CPI-M in Kerala experienced an unforeseen setback on Monday when veteran leader and former Devaswom Minister G. Sudhakaran criticized the Pinarayi Vijayan administration, connecting its claims of being 'number one' with the current Sabarimala gold plating scandal.
“Recently, it has been frequently claimed that Kerala excels in everything. Now, with the gold plates from the Sabarimala temple reportedly missing, it seems we are the best in that aspect too,” remarked Sudhakaran, prompting enthusiastic applause from the crowd.
What seems to have particularly upset the CPI-M leadership is that Sudhakaran made these comments during a cultural event organized by the Congress party’s cultural wing in Alappuzha.
His pointed critique, especially from a long-time party figure, is considered a significant breach of discipline at this politically crucial time.
Sudhakaran, aged 75, has held ministerial positions in both the V.S. Achuthanandan (2006–11) and the inaugural Pinarayi Vijayan (2016–21) Cabinets and is well-regarded for his integrity and straightforward approach.
Yet, his political career took a hit when the party refused to nominate him for the 2021 Assembly elections, despite his extensive experience and service record.
Even though he has been somewhat marginalized, Sudhakaran has occasionally voiced his concerns about the performance of the second Vijayan government, but his comments on Monday stand out as his most explicit critique.
Once a devoted supporter of Achuthanandan, Sudhakaran aligned with Vijayan after he gained firm control over the party.
However, his recent comments may indicate a potential return to dissenting views.
The timing of his statements was particularly awkward for the CPI-M, coinciding with the Kerala High Court's directive for a high-level inquiry, led by ADGP H. Venkatesh, into the missing Sabarimala gold plating, with a report expected in a month.
Sudhakaran, who has previously faced disciplinary measures, including public reprimands and demotion, now finds himself once again in the party's spotlight.
Point of View
It's crucial to recognize the complexities within political parties like CPI-M. Sudhakaran's remarks reflect not only personal grievances but also broader concerns about governance and accountability. This incident underscores the importance of internal discourse in political parties, especially during sensitive times.
NationPress
06/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Sudhakaran say about the Sabarimala gold controversy?
Sudhakaran criticized the Pinarayi Vijayan government, suggesting that Kerala's claims of being 'number one' now extend to the missing gold plates from the Sabarimala temple.
Why is Sudhakaran's criticism significant?
His remarks are notable because they come from a senior CPI-M leader, indicating potential internal dissent and a serious breach of party discipline.
What is the context of the missing Sabarimala gold?
The missing gold plates have prompted a high-level investigation ordered by the Kerala High Court, highlighting ongoing concerns about transparency and governance.
