Is the Supreme Court Taking Action Against Delhi's Air Pollution?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Supreme Court of India is determined to address the air pollution crisis in Delhi, emphasizing the need for action beyond blaming farmers. With a report due from the CAQM, the court seeks clarity on pollution sources and measures taken by the Environment Ministry. Will this lead to real solutions for the toxic air affecting millions?
Key Takeaways
- The Supreme Court is taking a firm stance against Delhi's air pollution.
- CAQM must deliver an actionable report within a week.
- The court is seeking solutions beyond blaming farmers for stubble burning.
- Construction activities are also a significant contributor to air quality issues.
- The Union Environment Ministry's efforts are under scrutiny for effectiveness.
New Delhi, Dec 1 (NationPress) The Supreme Court, on Monday, expressed its inability to remain a passive observer regarding the toxic air quality in the National Capital, which is detrimental to millions. Refusing to comment on the effects of agricultural fires, the court emphasized its commitment to act rather than be idle.
A panel led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi instructed the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) to deliver a report within a week detailing an actionable plan to combat the ongoing air quality crisis and to outline measures taken against pollutants apart from stubble burning.
As the next hearing is scheduled for December 10, the bench raised questions regarding CAQM’s immediate strategy for cleaning Delhi's air and inquired about the primary pollutant identified through scientific methods.
During discussions related to the MC Mehta case, the apex court cautioned against placing the blame solely on farmers for the air quality issues and sought insights into how construction activities and other factors contribute to the pollution levels in the Capital.
The court stated, “It would be unfair to solely attribute the toxic air to stubble burning, as it would unjustly burden individuals with limited representation in court.”
The bench also posited, “Stubble burning was prevalent during the COVID period, yet there were instances of clear blue skies. What has changed?”
It noted that the issue of crop burning should not devolve into a matter of political contention or pride. If farmers resort to burning, they do so for economic reasons, as it involves valuable assets, the court remarked.
The bench sought information on measures implemented by the Union Environment Ministry and their results. “Has there been any positive outcome?” questioned the Chief Justice-led panel.
Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati informed the court that reports detailing actions taken by all relevant authorities, including Punjab, Haryana, and the CPCB, would be submitted.
She acknowledged that the goal of achieving “zero burning” across all states had not yet been reached, but clarified that stubble burning is merely a seasonal issue.
Point of View
It is essential to highlight the importance of the Supreme Court's proactive stance in addressing Delhi's air pollution. The court's focus on a comprehensive approach, rather than targeting farmers alone, showcases a commitment to finding equitable solutions that benefit all citizens affected by this pressing issue.
NationPress
01/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Supreme Court's stance on Delhi's air pollution?
The Supreme Court has stated it cannot remain idle while the air quality deteriorates and is seeking actionable strategies to combat pollution.
What is the CAQM required to do?
The Commission for Air Quality Management is instructed to submit a report within a week outlining strategies to address the air crisis.
Is stubble burning the only cause of pollution in Delhi?
No, the court has emphasized that other factors, like construction activities, also contribute to the pollution and should not be overlooked.
