Did the SC Justify the FIR Against Abdullah Azam Khan in Forgery Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court has upheld the FIR against Abdullah Azam Khan for allegedly utilizing forged documents for passport acquisition. This ruling follows a dismissal of his plea by the Allahabad High Court, emphasizing the distinct nature of the offenses involved. The trial court is now set to proceed with the case.
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court dismissed plea against Abdullah Azam Khan.
- FIR pertains to alleged use of forged documents.
- Trial court allowed to proceed independently.
- Distinct offenses involved in the case.
- Upholding legal accountability is vital.
New Delhi, Nov 6 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has rejected a plea from former Uttar Pradesh MLA Abdullah Azam Khan, the son of prominent Samajwadi Party figure Azam Khan, who sought to dismiss an FIR accusing him of using forged documents to obtain a passport.
A panel comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and Prashant Kumar Mishra upheld the decision of the Allahabad High Court, which had previously denied the request to quash the FIR. The bench remarked, "We are not inclined to interfere. However, we clarify that the trial court can resolve all matters independently of the High Court's decision."
During the proceedings, Justice Sundresh's panel commented: "Trust the trial court. Let the trial court make the decision. Why should we interfere when the trial process is already underway?"
Previously, the Allahabad High Court had turned down Abdullah Azam Khan’s plea to dismiss the FIR, stating that the offenses involving the acquisition of a forged birth certificate and its subsequent use for obtaining a passport were "separate and distinct acts."
Abdullah had been convicted in a different case for allegedly acquiring a false birth certificate through fabricated documents. He contended that since the passport was issued based on the same forged certificate, facing prosecution again constituted double jeopardy.
A single-judge panel led by Justice Sameer Jain asserted that the principle of double jeopardy did not apply because the two cases were founded on differing facts and distinct offenses.
Deeming the plea "lacking in merit," the Allahabad High Court dismissed Abdullah Azam’s request.
"This application is devoid of merits and is, therefore, dismissed. The trial court is instructed to proceed with the trial according to the law."
An FIR was lodged at the Civil Lines Police Station in Rampur district against Abdullah Azam Khan under Sections 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery with intent to cheat), and 471 (using a forged document as if it were genuine) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Point of View
It is crucial to highlight that the judiciary's independence is paramount in cases like that of Abdullah Azam Khan. Upholding the FIR reflects the legal system's commitment to ensuring accountability, regardless of political affiliations. The legal proceedings must continue unimpeded, maintaining the trust of the public in the judicial process.
NationPress
06/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the basis for the FIR against Abdullah Azam Khan?
The FIR is based on allegations that Abdullah Azam Khan used forged documents to obtain a passport, including a false birth certificate.
What did the Supreme Court decide regarding the FIR?
The Supreme Court dismissed Abdullah Azam Khan's plea to quash the FIR, allowing the trial court to proceed with the case.
What is the significance of the High Court's ruling?
The Allahabad High Court ruled that the offenses of obtaining a forged birth certificate and using it to secure a passport are distinct, justifying separate prosecutions.
What are the implications of this ruling?
The ruling emphasizes the importance of legal accountability and upholds the trial court's authority to adjudicate the case without external influence.
What charges does the FIR entail?
The FIR against Abdullah Azam Khan includes charges under Sections 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery), 468 (forgery for cheating), and 471 (using a forged document) of the Indian Penal Code.
