Did Samrat Chaudhary Really Have Ties to the 1995 Tarapur Massacre?

Click to start listening
Did Samrat Chaudhary Really Have Ties to the 1995 Tarapur Massacre?

Synopsis

In a riveting political clash, Bihar's Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Chaudhary fiercely denies Prashant Kishor's allegations linking him to notorious murder cases from the 1990s, labeling them as childish. As accusations fly, the historical context and political tensions of Bihar resurface, reigniting old wounds ahead of the upcoming elections.

Key Takeaways

  • Samrat Chaudhary denies allegations linking him to the 1995 massacre.
  • The claims are made by Prashant Kishor, a prominent political figure.
  • Chaudhary calls the allegations “childish” and an attempt to gain media attention.
  • Political tensions in Bihar are resurfacing as elections approach.
  • The case has historical significance, involving past political grievances.

Patna, Sep 29 (NationPress) Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Chaudhary vehemently dismissed the accusations made by Prashant Kishor, the founder of Jan Suraaj, which connected him to the 1995 Tarapur massacre and the notorious Shilpi-Gautam murder case. He described the allegations as “childish” and “factually baseless.”

Kishor had previously asserted that the CBI interrogated Samrat Chaudhary, then known as Rakesh Kumar, the son of former minister Shakuni Chaudhary, in connection with the Shilpi murder case. He claimed that the Lalu-Rabri government had protected him.

Kishor also referenced a Supreme Court affidavit to highlight inconsistencies regarding Chaudhary's age, urging for his immediate arrest.

In his first response, Samrat Chaudhary remarked, “This novice is talking like a child. The Rakesh he is referring to is an ice cream seller from Hajipur, not me. My name is nowhere in the CBI investigation. This is nothing but an attempt to remain in the media.”

The Deputy CM countered Kishor's remarks, questioning the source of the Rs 241 crore that Kishor claimed to have earned through consulting services.

“Where did you get Rs 241 crore? Who gave you the money? Since he is in politics, he has to answer it. I am not going to be fooled by this novice.”

Samrat further recounted the political tensions of the 1990s, alleging that during Lalu Prasad Yadav’s rule, “He (Lalu) and his supporters urinated in the grain and well of my house and jailed 22 members of my family. It was Nitish Kumar, then in the opposition, who walked seven kilometres to speak for us. The Human Rights Commission appealed, and the Supreme Court even penalised the Lalu government,” Choudhary stated.

Earlier, Prashant Kishor had launched a fierce attack on the Bihar government, calling for the immediate termination and arrest of Samrat Chaudhary concerning the 1995 Tarapur murder case.

While addressing a press conference at his camp office in Patliputra Golambar, Kishor accused Samrat Chaudhary of manipulating his age in official documents to evade conviction in a case involving the murder of seven individuals from the Kushwaha community.

Kishor presented documents indicating that in case number 44/1995, the accused was identified as Rakesh Kumar alias Samrat Chandra Maurya alias Samrat Chaudhary, son of Shakuni Chaudhary, with a documented birth date of May 1, 1981.

Kishor argued that this led the court to treat him as a minor, resulting in his release from jail at that time.

However, in 2020, Samrat Chaudhary stated his age as 51 in an affidavit submitted to the Election Commission, which would imply he was 26 years old in 1995, thus not a minor.

“The court acquitted him on mistaken identity and age discrepancy. If the law is equal for all, he should be in jail until a competent court releases him,” Kishor stated, calling on Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and Governor Arif Mohammad Khan to take swift action.

“Either dismiss him and arrest him, or release all murder accused of the state,” he added, threatening to lead a delegation to the Governor if no immediate action is taken.

Kishor further claimed that Samrat Chaudhary’s name had also emerged in the Shilpi-Gautam rape and murder case, which was investigated by the CBI.

“Samrat Chaudhary should clarify whether these allegations are true. If he denies them, we will produce more documentary evidence,” he warned.

As both leaders exchange sharp barbs, the long-standing Tarapur massacre and Shilpi-Gautam case have resurfaced as a contentious issue in Bihar’s politically charged atmosphere as the 2025 Assembly elections approach.

Point of View

It's crucial to discern the facts amidst the accusations. Both Samrat Chaudhary and Prashant Kishor are seasoned political figures with their own narratives. This incident exemplifies the heated nature of Bihar's political landscape, where historical grievances and current allegations intermingle. The public deserves transparency and accountability from their leaders.
NationPress
29/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the allegations against Samrat Chaudhary?
Samrat Chaudhary is accused by Prashant Kishor of being linked to the 1995 Tarapur massacre and the Shilpi-Gautam murder case.
How did Samrat Chaudhary respond to these allegations?
Chaudhary dismissed the accusations as childish and factually baseless, asserting that they are an attempt by Kishor to stay in the media.
What is the significance of the 1995 Tarapur massacre?
The Tarapur massacre is a historical incident in Bihar where seven individuals from the Kushwaha community were murdered, leading to significant political and social repercussions.
What actions did Prashant Kishor demand from the government?
Kishor called for the immediate dismissal and arrest of Samrat Chaudhary in connection with the murder case.
How could these allegations impact the upcoming elections?
As the political landscape heats up in Bihar, these allegations could influence voter perceptions and party dynamics ahead of the 2025 Assembly elections.
Nation Press