Did Tejashwi Yadav Address EC's Allegation of Dual EPIC Numbers?

Click to start listening
Did Tejashwi Yadav Address EC's Allegation of Dual EPIC Numbers?

Synopsis

In a bold move, Tejashwi Yadav, Bihar's Leader of the Opposition, responds to allegations from the Election Commission regarding dual EPIC numbers. He criticizes the Bihar government and highlights the need for genuine progress in the state. His remarks on Amit Shah and local strongman leaders add layers to this ongoing political saga.

Key Takeaways

  • Tejashwi Yadav has responded to EC allegations.
  • The Bihar government is facing scrutiny over its actions.
  • Promises made by political leaders remain a focal point of criticism.
  • Local strongman leaders are influencing Bihar's political dynamics.
  • Public sentiment is key in assessing the efficacy of political actions.

Patna, Aug 9 (NationPress) The Leader of the Opposition in Bihar, Tejashwi Yadav, announced on Saturday that he has already provided a formal response to the Election Commission concerning the claims of having two EPIC (Electors Photo Identity Card) numbers.

While addressing reporters at Patna Airport, Tejashwi stated, “The response has already been submitted to the Election Commission. Creating unnecessary headlines on this matter won't yield any results.”

Previously, on August 8, the SDM of Patna had sent a second notice to Tejashwi Yadav, alleging that he possessed two EPIC numbers.

The notice further claimed that the EPIC number he presented during a press conference in Patna on August 2, 2025, was counterfeit. Tejashwi countered by stating, “Those responsible for issuing two EPIC numbers are now questioning my integrity.”

The Patna SDM office had sent the initial notice on August 6.

Tejashwi Yadav also criticized Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing him of making repeated promises without demonstrating any results.

“Amit Shah visits here and reiterates his promises every time. Why isn’t he discussing Bihar’s advancement—addressing unemployment, inflation, migration, poverty, and the improvement of education and health? Bihar will not gain anything from the derogatory comments against Lalu Prasad Yadav and myself. Such individuals embody a negative mindset and engage in detrimental politics. This will not have any impact on us,” he remarked.

He continued, “Amit Shah should come and reside here, but the people of Bihar will not offer him any support.”

When questioned about “bahubali” (strongman) leaders like Anant Singh and Anand Mohan meeting Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, Tejashwi dismissed the issue.

“These individuals are not significant enough for me to respond. Consult our spokespersons—they comprehend the AK-47 dialect. The same Nitish Kumar regime that confiscated AK-47s and weapons from their residences also released them from imprisonment. They are inconsequential figures, and the people of Bihar are well aware of them.”

Point of View

It's essential to remain impartial while reporting on this political discourse. Tejashwi Yadav's response to the Election Commission reflects the ongoing tensions within Bihar's political landscape. The allegations of dual EPIC numbers raise questions about accountability in governance. The focus should remain on constructive dialogue about Bihar's issues rather than personal attacks.
NationPress
20/08/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the allegation against Tejashwi Yadav?
Tejashwi Yadav has been accused of holding two EPIC numbers by the Election Commission.
What was Tejashwi Yadav's response?
He stated that he has already submitted a formal reply to the Election Commission regarding these allegations.
What did he say about Amit Shah?
Tejashwi criticized Amit Shah for making promises without delivering results and questioned his focus on Bihar's development.
How did he respond to the SDM's notices?
Tejashwi dismissed the notices as attempts to create unnecessary headlines and emphasized that he has addressed the concerns raised.
What is the political environment in Bihar?
The political climate in Bihar is tense, with ongoing debates about governance, accountability, and the impact of local strongman leaders.