Tharoor backs Anand Mahindra on the real value of conferences
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
When Anand Mahindra defended the worth of attending major conferences, Congress MP Dr. Shashi Tharoor knew exactly what he was talking about — and said so, publicly, on Sunday, 18 October 2026.
Tharoor echoed Mahindra's sentiment with characteristic directness, writing: 'Well said, @anandmahindra. People sometimes think of such conferences as window-dressing or an excuse for swanning around. The invaluable learnings that come from exchanges with the other participants are why it's worth making the time for such gatherings.'
A shared defence of deliberate dialogue
The pushback against high-profile conferences is a familiar one — critics often frame them as elite networking dressed up in the language of ideas. Both Tharoor and Mahindra represent voices who have long argued the opposite: that structured, cross-sectoral dialogue produces insights no briefing document can replicate.
Anand Mahindra, Chairman of the Mahindra Group, is among India's most visible business figures on public platforms, regularly using social media to reflect on innovation, leadership, and the country's economic direction. His original post drew an immediate, warm response from Tharoor — a signal that the sentiment resonates well beyond the boardroom.
Tharoor's own record in the room where it happens
Tharoor's endorsement carries the weight of experience. As a former UN Under-Secretary-General and a long-serving parliamentarian, he has participated in international forums across decades — from multilateral summits to literary festivals to economic conclaves. His defence of such gatherings is not abstract; it is biographical.
The 'swanning around' charge — the perception that attendees are there for prestige rather than purpose — is one that serious participants routinely have to answer for. Tharoor's point is simple and pointed: the hallway conversation, the unexpected exchange with an expert from a different field, the argument that shifts a position — these are the real returns on the time invested.
No specific conference was named by either figure, but the broader argument stands on its own. In an era when remote meetings have become the default, the case for being physically present in a room of curious, capable people is one that both a global business leader and a globe-trotting legislator are well-placed to make — and clearly feel strongly enough to make together.