Is ECI’s Definition of ‘Relative’ in SIR Truly Inconsistent?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Trinamool Congress raises alarm over ECI's definition of 'relative'.
- Confusion among voters due to contradictory guidelines.
- Special intensive revision (SIR) began on November 4.
- Limited options in BLO application for 'relative' category.
- Demands for clarity and action from ECI.
Kolkata, Nov 8 (NationPress) The Trinamool Congress has formally addressed a letter to the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of West Bengal, highlighting the inconsistency in the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) definition of “relative” during the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR), which commenced in West Bengal on November 4.
In the correspondence directed to CEO Manoj Kumar Agarwal, a copy of which is available with IANS, the Trinamool Congress has accused the ECI of adopting conflicting positions regarding the “relative” categorization.
The party asserts that while Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar indicated on October 27 that individuals could include their uncle's name or other relatives on the SIR enumeration form, this claim contradicts the written directives provided to booth-level officers (BLOs) as well as the BLO software interface, which stipulates that only parents and grandparents qualify under the “relative” classification.
“The dropdown options in the BLO application currently offer a limited selection of relations —son, daughter, grandson, granddaughter, and transgender— without the ability to select other relations like brother, sister, uncle, or any other blood relation,” the Trinamool Congress's letter to the West Bengal CEO stated.
On Saturday, the Trinamool Congress released a statement questioning the credibility of the Chief Election Commissioner’s remarks versus the ECI’s actual actions regarding this matter.
“This discrepancy has left BLOs throughout Bengal in a state of confusion, caused unrest among voters, and exposed a troubling divide between public declarations and real-world application. If Gyanesh Kumar’s claim is accurate, why does the ECI fail to act accordingly? Conversely, if it isn’t, why create confusion before the nation on public platforms?” the statement from the Trinamool Congress elaborated.
The party has urged the ECI to either promptly put into action the Chief Election Commissioner's pronouncements or cease the pretense of neutrality. “Bengal will not remain passive while the regulations are manipulated for one party's benefit,” the party’s statement concluded.