Should the TN Govt Exempt Goods Vehicles from VLTD Rule?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Tamil Nadu State Sand Lorry Owners Federation has urged the government to withdraw its VLTD mandate for goods vehicles, calling it unnecessary and financially burdensome. This appeal comes as the deadline approaches, raising questions about the necessity of such regulations.
Key Takeaways
- The VLTD mandate is viewed as financially burdensome.
- Most commercial vehicles already utilize tracking systems.
- Stakeholder consultations are critical for effective governance.
- The federation is seeking a settlement scheme for unpaid fines.
- The VLTD implementation deadline is approaching.
Chennai, Sep 13 (NationPress) The Tamil Nadu State Sand Lorry Owners Federation has requested the State government to reconsider its mandate that requires the installation of Vehicle Location Tracking Devices (VLTD) on goods and light commercial vehicles, claiming that the regulation is both unnecessary and a financial burden.
In a correspondence to Transport Minister S.S. Sivasankar, federation president S. Yuvaraj expressed that the transport sector is fully in favor of implementing VLTDs on passenger vehicles to enhance commuter safety.
He pointed out that this initiative was part of nationwide safety reforms initiated after the infamous 2012 Delhi gang-rape incident.
“We do not oppose the installation of VLTDs in passenger buses and taxis. However, applying this to lorries and light vehicles does not genuinely enhance safety and seems to be motivated solely by revenue generation,” he stated.
Yuvaraj highlighted that numerous commercial vehicles are already equipped with GPRS-based tracking systems. He argued that mandating an additional device is an unnecessary duplication and adds to financial strain.
He also criticized the government for failing to consult transport associations prior to issuing this directive.
“In a democratic setting, discussions with stakeholders are crucial. Directives issued without dialogue breed mistrust,” he stated.
The Commissionerate of Transport and Road Safety has issued an Expression of Interest (EOI) for VLTD manufacturers to implement the scheme by October 22. As per the notice, the requirement will include buses, school vehicles, stage carriages, tourist permit vehicles, private service vehicles, taxis, maxi cabs, and goods carriers such as water and petroleum tankers.
The department retains the authority to broaden the rule to encompass other vehicle categories if necessary.
Furthermore, the federation has called on the government to resolve the long-standing issue of unpaid traffic fines generated through the State’s online penalty system.
Yuvaraj mentioned that penalties amounting to hundreds of crores remain unsettled, often because they were issued based solely on vehicle registration numbers and enforcement targets.
He proposed that Tamil Nadu adopt a one-time settlement scheme akin to those in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, where vehicle owners could pay 50% of their dues through a compound fine or Lok Adalat mechanism.
“We are willing to clear our arrears if such a concession is provided. This would alleviate burdens on vehicle owners while ensuring that the State collects substantial revenue,” the federation asserted.
As the deadline for VLTD implementation approaches, the federation’s appeal has intensified calls for a reassessment of the government’s directive.
Point of View
The ongoing debate about the VLTD mandate in Tamil Nadu highlights the need for balanced regulations that prioritize both safety and the financial viability of transport operators. Engaging with stakeholders before implementing such measures is essential for fostering trust and ensuring effective governance.
NationPress
13/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the Tamil Nadu Federation opposing the VLTD requirement?
The federation argues that the VLTD requirement for goods vehicles is unnecessary, financially burdensome, and does not significantly enhance safety since many vehicles already use GPRS-based tracking systems.
What are the potential financial implications of the VLTD order?
The federation believes that the extra cost of installing VLTDs on vehicles will create an unnecessary financial strain on owners, who are already managing existing tracking systems.
Has the government consulted transport associations regarding the VLTD mandate?
The federation criticized the government for not holding consultations with transport associations before issuing the VLTD mandate, emphasizing the importance of stakeholder dialogue.
What is the deadline for VLTD implementation in Tamil Nadu?
The deadline for VLTD implementation is set for October 22, as indicated by the Commissionerate of Transport and Road Safety.
What alternative does the federation propose for unpaid traffic fines?
The federation suggests that Tamil Nadu introduce a one-time settlement scheme, allowing vehicle owners to pay 50% of their dues, similar to schemes in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.
