CBI Court Sentences Four, Including UCO Bank Officials, to Five Years for Fraud
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Ahmedabad, March 24 (NationPress) A specialized CBI court in Ahmedabad has found four individuals guilty, including two former UCO Bank officials, who have each been sentenced to five years of Rigorous Imprisonment along with monetary penalties in two distinct bank fraud cases, as reported on Tuesday.
On March 23, the court handed down the sentence to former Senior Manager Medam Bhagavathi Prasad, former Assistant Manager Bhaskar Rameshchandra Soni, and private individuals involved in the fraud.
In the initial case, the court imposed a sentence of five years’ rigorous imprisonment on Medam Bhagavathi Prasad, Bhaskar Rameshchandra Soni, and Jayendrasinh Dahyaji Makwana, the owner of M/s Heaven Five Enterprise, along with a cumulative fine of Rs 1.33 crore.
This case was initiated by the CBI on April 27, 2016, against the accused and other parties.
It was claimed that Prasad, while acting as the Branch Manager of UCO Bank’s Chiloda branch in Gandhinagar, fraudulently approved and disbursed cash credit limits and term loans totaling Rs 6.43 crore based on forged documentation provided by various borrowers.
Investigations uncovered that the overall outstanding balance across 17 loan accounts was Rs 3.63 crore as of December 2015. The majority of these accounts were classified as Non-Performing Assets (NPAs), while others were close to becoming NPAs, resulting in significant financial loss for the bank. The CBI submitted a chargesheet related to the case on November 17, 2017.
In a second case, the court found and sentenced four individuals — Medam Bhagavathi Prasad, Bhaskar Rameshchandra Soni, and private individual Vanrajji Prabhtaji Solanki, the owner of M/s Shree Vanraj Enterprise — to five years of rigorous imprisonment and a total fine of Rs 72 lakh.
The CBI launched this second case on April 27, 2016, based on similar accusations of fraudulent loan approvals and disbursements based on falsified documents, resulting in considerable financial losses and multiple loan accounts transitioning to NPAs.
Upon concluding the trial, the court determined the defendants were guilty and imposed sentences accordingly in both cases, as stated by the agency.