Did Allahabad HC Uphold Keshav Prasad Maurya's Degree Validity?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the educational credentials of UP Deputy CM Keshav Prasad Maurya. This significant ruling emphasizes legal standing and the requirement for direct impact to initiate criminal proceedings. Discover the implications of this judgment and its background.
Key Takeaways
- High Court upheld lower court's ruling
- Petitioner lacked legal standing
- Allegations of forged documents denied
- Political integrity remains a critical issue
- Importance of credible evidence highlighted
Prayagraj, July 7 (NationPress) The Allahabad High Court has rejected a criminal revision petition against Uttar Pradesh's Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya, which questioned the validity of his educational qualification. A single-judge bench, led by Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh, determined that the petitioner, Diwakar Nath Tripathi, was neither a victim nor an affected party, thus he did not possess the legal standing to pursue criminal action.
Tripathi had alleged that Maurya presented a forged degree to obtain a petrol pump allocation and to participate in elections. He sought the filing of an FIR and a thorough investigation.
After deliberating on the arguments from both parties, the court had reserved its decision on May 25, and the ruling was made public on Monday.
This case traces back to 2021 when Tripathi petitioned the district court under Section 156(3) of the CrPC, requesting an FIR registration.
He claimed that Maurya had submitted false affidavits concerning his educational qualifications during the elections of 2007, 2012, and 2014, and had utilized forged documents to acquire petrol stations from Indian Oil Corporation.
The trial court dismissed his request on September 4, 2021, concluding that no cognizable offence was established against Maurya. Consequently, Tripathi's appeal was denied.
Following this, Tripathi approached the High Court with a criminal revision petition, which was initially dismissed due to a delay of 318 days.
Nonetheless, on January 6 this year, the Supreme Court overturned the High Court’s order, mandating it to evaluate the case on its merits.
Upon reviewing the matter, the High Court confirmed the lower court's ruling, emphasizing that only someone directly affected has the right to initiate criminal proceedings in such contexts.
Point of View
This ruling reaffirms the necessity for legal standing in challenging political figures. It highlights the judicial system's role in ensuring that claims against public officials are substantiated and that the law is upheld without misuse. As the nation scrutinizes political integrity, this case serves as a reminder of the importance of credible evidence in the pursuit of justice.
NationPress
26/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the outcome of the petition against Keshav Prasad Maurya?
The Allahabad High Court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner lacked legal standing.
Who filed the petition against Maurya?
The petition was filed by Diwakar Nath Tripathi, who alleged that Maurya presented a fake degree.
What was the basis of Tripathi's allegations?
Tripathi claimed that Maurya submitted false affidavits regarding his educational qualifications for elections and petrol pump allocations.
What did the Supreme Court decide regarding the case?
The Supreme Court overturned an earlier dismissal by the High Court, directing it to reconsider the case on its merits.
What is the significance of the High Court's ruling?
The ruling emphasizes that only individuals directly affected by a matter have the right to initiate criminal proceedings.
